International physical activity questionnaire:: 12-country reliability and validity
International physical activity questionnaire:: 12-country reliability and validity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1249/01.mss.0000078924.61453.fb
复制
发表时间：
2003-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Oja, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Craig, CL;Marshall, AL;Oja, P
背景：缺乏体力活动是一个全球关注的问题，但目前使用的不同体力活动指标阻碍了国际比较。国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)是作为跨国监测体力活动和不活动的工具而制定的。方法：1997至1998年间，一个国际共识小组开发了四种长形式和四种短形式的iPAQ工具(通过电话访谈或自我管理，有两个交替的参照期，要么是最近7天，要么是回忆起的体力活动的“通常一周”)。2000年期间，来自12个国家的14个中心收集了至少8个iPAQ工具中的两个的可靠性和/或有效性数据。在同一周内评估重测的可重复性。同时(方法间)有效性在同一次给药中评估，标准iPAQ的有效性根据CSA(现在的MTI)加速度计进行评估。斯皮尔曼的相关系数是根据报告的总体力活动来报告的。结果：总体而言，iPAQ问卷产生了可重复的数据(Spearman‘s p聚在0.8左右)，短表和长表的数据具有可比性。标准效度的中位数p约为0.30，与大多数其他自我报告验证研究相当。“通常一周”和“最后7天”的参照期表现相似，电话管理的可靠性与自我管理模式相似。结论：iPAQ工具具有可接受的测量特性，至少与其他已建立的自我报告一样好。考虑到本研究中的不同样本，iPAQ具有合理的测量特性，可以监测不同环境下18至65岁成年人的身体活动水平。建议将简短的“最后7天召回”用于国家监测，而将较长的表格用于需要更详细评估的研究。
Background: Physical inactivity is a global concern, but diverse physical activity measures in use prevent international comparisons. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed as an instrument for cross-national monitoring of physical activity and inactivity. Methods: Between 1997 and 1998, an International Consensus Group developed four long and four short forms of the IPAQ instruments (administered by telephone interview or self-administration, with two alternate reference periods, either the "last 7 d" or a "usual week" of recalled physical activity). During 2000, 14 centers from 12 countries collected reliability and/or validity data on at least two of the eight IPAQ instruments. Test-retest repeatability was assessed within the same week. Concurrent (inter-method) validity was assessed at the same administration, and criterion IPAQ validity was assessed against the CSA (now MTI) accelerometer. Spearman's correlation coefficients are reported, based on the total reported physical activity. Results: Overall, the IPAQ questionnaires produced repeatable data (Spearman's p clustered around 0.8), with comparable data from short and long forms. Criterion validity had a median p of about 0.30, which was comparable to most other self-report validation studies. The "usual week" and "last 7 d" reference periods performed similarly, and the reliability of telephone administration was similar to the self-administered mode. Conclusions: The IPAQ instruments have acceptable measurement properties, at least as good as other established self-reports. Considering the diverse samples in this study, IPAQ has reasonable measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity among 18- to 65-yr-old adults in diverse settings. The short IPAQ form "last 7 d recall" is recommended for national monitoring and the long form for research requiring more detailed assessment.