FROM OLD PUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION TO NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
FROM OLD PUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION TO NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09540969409387823
复制
发表时间：
1994-07-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
HOOD, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DUNLEAVY, P;HOOD, C
本文首先结合以往的管理改革努力，探讨现在人们熟悉的“新公共管理”概念，认为新公共管理已被证明是一个相当持久和一致的议程。然后回顾了公共服务内部和外部对新公共管理的主要批评，展示了主要批评之间的紧张和矛盾。为了持久，国家预防机制必须能够通过修改其议程来适应不同的批评，试图找出国家预防管理方法最突出的缺陷所在的领域。最后，讨论了国家公共管理的一些未来挑战：传统和现代公共管理风格传统区别之外的成果前景；不适当克隆的风险；以及关于公共部门机构核心能力的准宪法问题。
This article starts by looking at the now familiar idea of 'New Public Management' in the light of previous efforts at managerial reform, arguing that NPM has proved a fairly durable and consistent agenda. Then the major criticisms of NPM within and outside the public service are reviewed, demonstrating the tensions and contradictions among the major criticisms. To endure, NPM must be capable of accommodating different poles of criticism by modifying its agenda, attempting to identify the areas where drawbacks in NPM methods are most salient. Finally, some future challenges for NPM are discussed: the prospect of outcomes outside the conventional distinction of traditional and modern public management styles; the risk of inappropriate cloning; and quasi-constitutional issues about the core competencies of public sector agencies.