Reaction time and anticipatory skill of athletes in open and closed skill-dominated sport

Reaction time and anticipatory skill of athletes in open and closed skill-dominated sport
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/17461391.2012.738712
复制
发表时间:
2013-09-01
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Moghadam, Behrouz Attarbashi
Moghadam, Behrouz Attarbashi
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nuri, Leila;Shadmehr, Azadeh;Moghadam, Behrouz Attarbashi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在运动中,反应时间和预期技能是感知能力的关键方面。迄今为止,还没有研究比较了运动员在开放式和封闭式技术主导运动中的反应时间和预期技能。因此,本研究调查了在这两个不同的运动领域之间是否存在感觉认知技能的差异。11名排球运动员和11名短跑运动员参加了本实验。两组的反应时间和预期技能通过定制的SART(速度预期和反应时间测试)软件记录。该软件由6个感官认知测试组成,分别评估视觉选择反应时间、视觉复杂选择反应时间、听觉选择反应时间、听觉复杂选择反应时间以及对球高速和低速的预期技能。对每个变量进行独立t检验。结果表明,短跑运动员在听觉和视觉两项测试中均优于短跑运动员(P < 0.05)。由此得出结论,运动员有更大的感觉认知技能与他们特定的运动领域相关,无论是开放的还是封闭的。
In sports, reaction time and anticipatory skill are critical aspects of perceptual abilities. To date, no study has compared reaction time and anticipatory skill of athletes from open and closed skill-dominated sport. Accordingly, the present study investigated whether a difference exists in sensory-cognitive skills between these two different sport domains. Eleven volleyball players and 11 sprinters participated in this experiment. Reaction time and anticipatory skill of both groups were recorded by a custom-made software called SART (speed anticipation and reaction time test). This software consists of six sensory-cognitive tests that evaluate visual choice reaction time, visual complex choice reaction time, auditory choice reaction time, auditory complex choice reaction time, and anticipatory skill of the high speed and low speed of the ball. For each variable, an independent t-test was performed. Results suggested that sprinters were better in both auditory reaction times (P 0.05 for both visual reaction time tests). It is concluded that athletes have greater sensory-cognitive skills related to their specific sport domain either open or closed.