Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations.
Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1748-5908-8-52
复制
发表时间：
2013-05-16
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Scott SD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Albrecht L;Archibald M;Arseneau D;Scott SD
受 Michie 等人的一篇重要论文的影响，该论文概述了实施科学现在要求的详细报告行为改变干预措施的基本原理和要求，我们创建并完善了一份清单，以在系统评价中实施干预发展和评估研究工作组 (WIDER) 的建议。 WIDER 建议提供了一个框架，用于识别行为改变干预措施的基本组成部分并提供详细报告，以促进干预措施的复制、进一步开发和扩大。 Scott 及其同事对各种医疗保健环境中的知识转化 (KT) 策略进行了四次系统审查，在此过程中制定、应用和改进了该清单。该清单是作为实施 WIDER 工作的一种方法而创建的，以便于对这些系统评价中包含的异质性研究进行比较。在四个发展阶段创建和应用清单的过程中遇到了许多挑战。由此产生的改进产生了一个“用户友好”且可复制的清单，用于使用 WIDER 建议评估系统评价中 KT 干预措施的报告质量。对于《Implementation Science》等期刊，使用 WIDER 建议作为行为改变干预研究评估报告的发表要求，找到检查、衡量和报告报告质量的方法至关重要。该清单是在系统审查方法中实施 WIDER 建议的一种方法。
Influenced by an important paper by Michie et al., outlining the rationale and requirements for detailed reporting of behavior change interventions now required by Implementation Science, we created and refined a checklist to operationalize the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations in systematic reviews. The WIDER recommendations provide a framework to identify and provide detailed reporting of the essential components of behavior change interventions in order to facilitate replication, further development, and scale-up of the interventions. The checklist was developed, applied, and improved over the course of four systematic reviews of knowledge translation (KT) strategies in a variety of healthcare settings conducted by Scott and associates. The checklist was created as one method of operationalizing the work of the WIDER in order to facilitate comparison across heterogeneous studies included in these systematic reviews. Numerous challenges were encountered in the process of creating and applying the checklist across four stages of development. The resulting improvements have produced a ‘user-friendly’ and replicable checklist to assess the quality of reporting of KT interventions in systematic reviews using the WIDER recommendations. With journals, such as Implementation Science, using the WIDER recommendations as publication requirements for evaluation reports of behavior change intervention studies, it is crucial to find methods of examining, measuring, and reporting the quality of reporting. This checklist is one approach to operationalize the WIDER recommendations in systematic review methodology.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1186/1748-5908-7-70
发表时间：
2012-07-25
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Scott SD;Albrecht L;O'Leary K;Ball GD;Hartling L;Hofmeyer A;Jones CA;Klassen TP;Kovacs Burns K;Newton AS;Thompson D;Dryden DM
通讯作者：
Dryden DM
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Abraham, Charles;Michie, Susan
通讯作者：
Michie, Susan
影响因子：
12.8
作者：
MONCHER, FJ;PRINZ, RJ
通讯作者：
PRINZ, RJ
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Davidson, KW;Goldstein, M;Whitlock, EP
通讯作者：
Whitlock, EP
影响因子：
12.8
作者：
Dane, AV;Schneider, BH
通讯作者：
Schneider, BH