Parent-adolescent bicycling safety communication and bicycling behavior.
Parent-adolescent bicycling safety communication and bicycling behavior.
复制标题
家长与青少年骑车安全沟通和骑车行为。
DOI：
10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.017
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Spears,Steven
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hamann,CaraJ;Spears,Steven
在美国，鼓励骑自行车上学的努力有所增加。然而，人们对亲子沟通如何影响自行车安全知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨亲子协议骑自行车的指示和他们的相关性与早期青少年的现实世界riding behavior.MethodsParent-child二人组被问到开放式的问题，他们给予/收到有关骑自行车的指示。然后将答案编码为九个类别（例如，过马路，自行车控制/处理）。结果36对亲子对被试在自行车安全指导上的一致性分布与青少年的实际骑车行为有关。青少年平均年龄为11.9岁（范围：10-15岁），父母平均年龄为43.3岁（范围：30-59岁）。常见的父母指示包括：戴头盔，骑在人行道上，和行程路线规范。高“骑在人行道上”的指令（38.9%的父母和青少年，22.2%的父母，16.7%的青少年只）是由于潜在的车道冲突的关注。父母和青少年之间的协议报告的指示是低的，整体。在真实世界的自行车运动中，自行车安全指导协议组之间的平均安全相关事件发生率没有显著差异（父母和青少年报告，仅父母，仅青少年，两者都没有）。青少年在不同基础设施类型（人行道、街道等）上骑行的时间比例并没有不同的报告父母之间的二人组已经给出了指示骑在人行道上，那些没有.ConclusionsResults强调缺乏家长和青少年之间的协议骑自行车的指示，青少年从父母。家长的指示，青少年骑自行车的安全与实际的骑行为。结果表明，父母给青少年的信息可能是无效的。鉴于父母是在一个有影响力的位置，结果表明，需要家长培训有效的安全相关的沟通策略，以帮助他们在利用自己的父母的角色，以增加他们的孩子的安全。
IntroductionEfforts to encourage bicycling to school have increased in the United States. However, little is known about how parent-child communication affects bicycle safety. The purpose of this study was to examine parent-child agreement on biking instructions and their correlation with the early adolescents’ real-world riding behavior.MethodsParent-child dyads were asked open-ended questions about instructions they had given/received about bicycling. Answers were then coded into nine categories (e.g., crossing the road, bicycle control/handling). Distributions of parent-child agreement on parent-given bicycle safety instructions were examined in relation to the adolescent’s real-world riding behaviors.Results36 parent-child dyads were included. Average age was 11.9 (Range: 10–15) for adolescents and 43.3 (Range: 30–59) for parents. Common parental instructions included: wear helmet, ride on sidewalk, and trip routing specifications. High ‘ride on sidewalk’ instruction (38.9% both parent and adolescent, 22.2% parent only, 16.7% adolescent only) was concerning due to potential driveway conflicts. Agreement between parents and adolescents on reported instructions was low, overall. Mean safety-relevant event rates in real-world cycling did not differ significantly between bicycle safety instruction agreement groups (both parent & adolescent reported, parent only, adolescent only, neither). The proportion of time an adolescent rode on different infrastructure types (sidewalk, street, etc.) did not vary between dyads reporting parents had given instructions to ride on the sidewalk and those who had not.ConclusionsResults highlight lack of agreement between parents and adolescents on cycling instructions the adolescent receives from the parent. Parent instructions to adolescents regarding bicycling safety were not associated with actual riding behaviors. Results suggest parent messaging to adolescents may be ineffective. Given parents are in a position of influence, results indicate a need for parental training on effective safety-related communication strategies to assist them in capitalizing on their parental role to increase their child’s safety.