The relationship between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and light extinction of dried particles: indications of underlying aerosol processes and implications for satellite-based CCN estimates

The relationship between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration and light extinction of dried particles: indications of underlying aerosol processes and implications for satellite-based CCN estimates
复制标题

DOI:
10.5194/acp-15-7585-2015
复制
发表时间:
2015-07
影响因子:
6.3
通讯作者:
Y. Shinozuka;A. Clarke;A. Nenes;A. Jefferson;R. Wood;C. McNaughton;J. Ström;P. Tunved;J. Redemann;K. Thornhill;R. Moore;T. Lathem;Jack J. Lin;Y. Yoon
Y. Shinozuka;A. Clarke;A. Nenes;A. Jefferson;R. Wood;C. McNaughton;J. Ström;P. Tunved;J. Redemann;K. Thornhill;R. Moore;T. Lathem;Jack J. Lin;Y. Yoon
中科院分区:
地球科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Y. Shinozuka;A. Clarke;A. Nenes;A. Jefferson;R. Wood;C. McNaughton;J. Ström;P. Tunved;J. Redemann;K. Thornhill;R. Moore;T. Lathem;Jack J. Lin;Y. Yoon

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

抽象的。我们研究了边界层云凝结核(CCN)的数量浓度和消光之间的关系,以调查潜在的气溶胶过程和基于卫星的CCN估计。对于不受尘埃影响的各种机载和地基观测,回归确定CCN(cm−3)在0.4 ± 0.1%过饱和度下为100.3α +1.3 0. 75,其中σ(Mm−1)是干燥颗粒的500 nm消光系数,α是埃指数。1 km水平平均数据与该近似值的偏差通常在2.0的因子内。α logCCN /α logσ小于1,因为在其他解释中,增长过程通常会使气溶胶散射更多的光,而不会增加它们的数量。这一点,除非特殊的气象气溶胶连接,关联的气溶胶光学厚度的两倍不到一倍的云凝结核,相反,以前的研究的基础上严重平均测量或卫星算法。
Abstract. We examine the relationship between the number concentration of boundary-layer cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and light extinction to investigate underlying aerosol processes and satellite-based CCN estimates. For a variety of airborne and ground-based observations not dominated by dust, regression identifies the CCN (cm−3) at 0.4 ± 0.1% supersaturation with 100.3α +1.3σ0.75 where σ (Mm−1) is the 500 nm extinction coefficient by dried particles and α is the Angstrom exponent. The deviation of 1 km horizontal average data from this approximation is typically within a factor of 2.0. ∂logCCN / ∂logσ is less than unity because, among other explanations, growth processes generally make aerosols scatter more light without increasing their number. This, barring special meteorology–aerosol connections, associates a doubling of aerosol optical depth with less than a doubling of CCN, contrary to previous studies based on heavily averaged measurements or a satellite algorithm.