Governing Police Stops Across Europe

Governing Police Stops Across Europe
复制标题

治安警察在欧洲各地驻扎

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-031-41363-6_2
复制
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lennon G
Lennon G
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lennon G

文献摘要

相似文献

警察拦截在整个欧洲都很普遍,但其法律的监管是异质的,在法律的结构、问责制和部署方面存在差异。本文探讨了英格兰和威尔士,芬兰和法国的警察局的监管框架,使跨司法管辖区的比较。这一框架分为三个特征:法律的结构、自由裁量权和法律的保障以及权力的正当性。分析揭示了法律的权力和保障措施的共同点和主要区别,包括一些非常宽松的监管。在确保有效监督方面,有些因素似乎更为重要。然而,监管框架与负面影响之间并没有简单的联系,警察领导层和安全当局的高度自由裁量权以及强调遏制犯罪和安全威胁的政治理由削弱了其他监管组成部分的有效性。
Police stops are pervasive across Europe, but their legal regulation is heterogeneous, with differences in legal structure, accountability and deployment. This paper examines the regulatory frameworks governing police stops in England and Wales, Finland and France to enable cross-jurisdictional comparisons. This framework is divided into three characteristics: the legal structure, discretion and legal safeguards, and the justification for the power. The analysis reveals commonalities and major differences in the legal powers and safeguards, including some very lax regulation. Some elements appear more central in ensuring effective oversight. There is, however, no simple connection between the regulatory framework and the negative impacts.High-level discretion of police leadership and security authorities and political justifications emphasising deterring crime and security threats diminish the effectiveness of other regulatory components.