Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum C-reactive protein in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum C-reactive protein in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s10741-020-09927-x
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Li KHC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lakhani I;Wong MV;Hung JKF;Gong M;Waleed KB;Xia Y;Lee S;Roever L;Liu T;Tse G;Leung KSK;Li KHC
Heart failure (HF) is a major epidemic with rising morbidity and mortality rates that encumber global healthcare systems. While some studies have demonstrated the value of CRP in predicting (i) the development of HFpEF and (ii) long-term clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients, others have shown no such correlation. As a result, we conducted the following systematic review and meta-analysis to assess both the diagnostic and prognostic role of CRP in HFpEF. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that assess the relationship between CRP and HFpEF using the following search terms: (((C-reactive protein) AND ((preserved ejection fraction) OR (diastolic heart failure))). The search period was from the start of database to August 6, 2019, with no language restrictions. A total of 312 and 233 studies were obtained from PubMed and Embase respectively, from which 19 studies were included. Our meta-analysis demonstrated the value of a high CRP in predicting the development of not only new onset HFpEF (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00–1.16; P = 0.04; I2 = 22%), but also an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality when used as a categorical (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.61–3.96; P < 0.0001; I2 = 19%) or a continuous variable (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.04–1.47; P = 0.01; I2 = 28%), as well as all-cause mortality when used as a categorical (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.53–2.06; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) or a continuous variable: (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02–1.06; P = 0.003; I2 = 61%) in HFpEF patients. CRP can be used as a biomarker to predict the development of HFpEF and long-term clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients, in turn justifying its use as a simple, accessible parameter to guide clinical management in this patient population. However, more prospective studies are still required to not only explore the utility and dynamicity of CRP in HFpEF but also to determine whether risk stratification algorithms incorporating CRP actually provide a material benefit in improving patient prognosis. The online version of this article (10.1007/s10741-020-09927-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Abernethy A;Raza S;Sun JL;Anstrom KJ;Tracy R;Steiner J;VanBuren P;LeWinter MM
通讯作者:
LeWinter MM
影响因子:
3
作者:
Lourenco, Patricia;Pereira, Joana;Bettencourt, Paulo
通讯作者:
Bettencourt, Paulo
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Chen, Wei-Siang;Chen, Shih-Jen;Wang, Chao-Hung
通讯作者:
Wang, Chao-Hung
影响因子:
24
作者:
Greenland, Philip;Alpert, Joseph S.;Whitman, Gayle R.
通讯作者:
Whitman, Gayle R.
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Imai, Ryo;Uemura, Yusuke;Murohara, Toyoaki
通讯作者:
Murohara, Toyoaki