Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth.
Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
复制
发表时间：
2003-06-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Schedle, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brunthaler, A;Konig, F;Schedle, A
本综述是对 1996 年至 2002 年间发表的后路树脂复合材料临床性能的前瞻性研究的调查。表格中详细介绍了材料、患者和操作者特定数据、观察期、手术区域的隔离方法和失败率。对数据进行统计评估，以评估材料（填料尺寸、粘合系统、基础材料[例如玻璃离子水门汀]和衬里材料）、研究设计和人员对故障率的作用。复合材料失败的主要原因是继发龋、修复体断裂和边缘缺损。由于测试物质种类繁多且缺乏特定于材料的文档，因此未评估不同商业材料品牌对故障率的影响。手术区域的隔离方法（橡皮障或棉卷）和操作者的专业地位（大学或普通牙医）对复合失败率的影响并不显着。观察期从 1 年到 17 年不等，失败率在 0% 到 45% 之间。发现故障率与观察期之间存在线性相关性（P
This review is a survey of prospective studies on the clinical performance of posterior resin composites published between 1996 and 2002. Material, patient- and operator-specific data, observation periods, isolation methods of the operative field, and failure rates are detailed in tables. The data were evaluated statistically in order to assess the role of materials (filler size, bonding system, base materials [e.g. glass ionomer cements], and lining materials), study design, and personnel on failure rates. The primary reasons for composite failure were secondary caries, restoration fracture, and marginal defects. The influence of different commercial material brands on failure rates was not evaluated due to the great variety of test substances and the lack of material-specific documentation. Effects of the isolation method of the operative field (rubber dam or cotton rolls) and the professional status of operators (university or general dentist) on composite failure rates were not found to be significant. Observation periods varied from 1 to 17 years, and failure rates ranged between 0% and 45%. A linear correlation between failure rate and observation period was found (P