Supporters and Underminers: Reply to Chandler
Supporters and Underminers: Reply to Chandler
复制标题
支持者和破坏者：回复钱德勒
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Richard Bradley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Richard Bradley
我认为，AGM信念修正理论的两个标准公理阻碍了它作为充分说明可废止推理的基础，因为它们分别不允许采用先前学到的逻辑上不包含的信念，并放弃那些与它们不矛盾的信念。
I argue that two of the standard axioms of the AGM theory of belief revision stand in the way of it serving as the basis for an adequate account of defeasible reasoning, because they respectively disallow the adoption of beliefs not logically entailed by those previously learned and the abandonment of those not contradicted by them.