Mismatch responses related to temporal discrimination of somatosensory stimulation

Mismatch responses related to temporal discrimination of somatosensory stimulation
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.021
复制
发表时间:
2005-08-01
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Kakigi, R
Kakigi, R
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Akatsuka, K;Wasaka, T;Kakigi, R

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:确定预注意诱发的体感失配负性成分的存在,并研究该成分在客观临床诊断中的应用。方法:首先,我们确定每个受试者成对刺激的时间辨别阈值(DT),并向手部施加两个顺序的电刺激,成对刺激时间为(1)DT ~ 10 ms,(2)DT-30 ms和(3)DT +50 ms。然后,我们使用一种古怪的范式,频繁(标准)和罕见(偏差)记录ERPs。在第一个实验中,我们使用DT-30 ms和DT-10 ms两种刺激,在第二个实验中,我们使用DT-30 ms和DT +50 ms两种刺激。在每个实验中,识别出两个特定的分量,一个在大约60 ms处达到峰值的负分量(N60)和一个在大约100-200 ms处达到峰值的大的正分量(P150),主要是在偏离刺激之后,被认为是躯体感觉不匹配的成分。结论:N60可能产生于被试能够清晰辨别的任务中,而P150可能产生于被试需要精细辨别的任务中,它似乎对应于听觉失配负波。意义:我们证实了我们的新方法可以用于时间辨别的客观检测。(c)2005年国际临床神经生理学联合会。由Elsevier爱尔兰有限公司出版。保留所有权利。
Objective: To determine the existence of a preattentively evoked somatosensory mismatch negativity component and to investigate the use of that component in objective clinical diagnostics.Methods: First we determined the temporal discrimination threshold (DT) of paired stimuli in each subject, and applied two sequential electrical stimuli to the hand with paired stimulus times of (1) DT -10 ms, (2) DT -30 ms and (3) DT +50 ms. Then, we recorded ERPs using an oddball paradigm, frequent (standard) and rare (deviant). We used two stimuli, DT-30 ms and DT-10 ms, in the first experiment, and DT -30 ms and DT +50 ms, in the second experiment.Results: In each experiment, two specific components, a negative component peaking at approximately 60 ms (N60) and a large positive component peaking around 100-200 ms (P150), were identified, mainly following the deviant stimulus, which were considered somatosensory mismatch components. N60 was more remarkably identified in the second experiment and P150 in the first.Conclusions: N60 might be generated during tasks which subjects can clearly discriminate, but P150, which seems to correspond to auditory mismatch negativity, might be generated in tasks which require fine discrimination.Significance: We confirmed that our new method could be used for the objective examination of temporal discrimination. (c) 2005 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.