Evaluation of patient-perceived health status using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form 36 in an intensive care unit population

Evaluation of patient-perceived health status using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form 36 in an intensive care unit population
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/00003246-199908000-00011
复制
发表时间:
1999-08-01
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
Long-Krug, S
Long-Krug, S
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Welsh, GH;Thompson, K;Long-Krug, S

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:由提供者评估的患者基线功能状态与重症监护病房(ICU)入院后的死亡率相关。我们想看看患者在进入ICU前对健康状况的自我感知是否与功能结局相关。设计:对方便样本进行前瞻性调查。环境:单一城市大学附属退伍军人事务医疗中心。患者:199例外科和内科/冠状动脉重症监护室患者,干预措施:无。测量方法:采用医疗结果调查简表36 (SF-36)监测患者评估的基线健康状况,该表格由36个问题组成,评估8个健康状态概念。此外,确定基线功能状态(Zubrod量表),并收集疾病严重程度(急性生理和慢性健康评估[APACHE] II)数据。入院后6周和6个月分别测定患者的Zubrod功能状态(包括死亡率),并计算相关系数。主要结果:我们发现在这种情况下,在9%的样本中收集SF-36健康状态数据是可行的。不到1%的回复是由代理人完成的。SF-36的数据内部一致,包括一般健康感知和身体功能在内的几个量表与患者的Zubrod功能状态相关(r(2) = 0.08, p < 0.001;R (2) = .14, p < .001),活力(R (2) = .04, p < .01),社会功能(R (2) = .03, p < .05)和身体角色功能(R (2) = .02, p = .053),尽管程度较小。6个月的功能状态也发现了类似的相关性。结论:我们得出的结论是,在ICU环境中使用SF-36具有时间效率,并与6周和6个月的功能预后相关。它也与功能结果相关,如基线Zubrod功能状态或APACHE II疾病严重程度测量。五个问题的一般健康评估部分与结果的相关性几乎与更广泛的36个问题的问卷一样好。使用SF-36可以确定医院间比较的患者群体。它也可能针对需要额外住院后护理的个人,包括康复服务或养老院安置。
Objective: Baseline patient functional status as assessed by providers is correlated with mortality after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We wanted to see if patient self-perception of health status before admission to an ICU correlated with functional outcome,Design: Prospective survey on a convenience sample.Setting: Single urban university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medial Center.Patients: One hundred ninety-nine patients in surgical and medical/coronary ICUs,Interventions: None.Measurements: Patient-assessed baseline health status was monitored with the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36), consisting of 36 questions that evaluate eight health status concepts. In addition, baseline functional status (Zubrod scale) was determined and severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II) data were collected. Zubrod functional status, which includes mortality, was determined 6 wks and 6 months after ICU admission, and correlation coefficients were calculated.Main Results: We found it feasible to collect SF-36 health status data on a 9% sample in this setting. Less than 1% of responses were completed by proxy. The SF-36 data were internally consistent, and several of its scales including general health perception and physical functioning correlated with patient Zubrod functional status (r(2) = .08, p < .001; r(2) = .14, p < .001) at 6 wks as did vitality (r(2) = .04, p < .01), social function (r(2) = .03, p < .05), and physical role function (r(2) = .02, p = .053), although to a lesser extent. Similar correlations were also found with 6-month functional status.Conclusions: We conclude that use of the SF-36 is time efficient in an ICU setting and correlates with 6-wk and 6-month functional outcome. It correlates as well with functional outcome as either the baseline Zubrod functional status or the APACHE II severity of illness measurement. The five-question general health evaluation portion correlated almost as well with outcome as the more extensive 36-item questionnaire. Use of the SF-36 may define patient populations for comparison across hospitals. It may also target individuals with needs for additional posthospitalization care, including rehabilitation services or nursing home placement.