It can W8: A community intervention to decrease distracted driving

It can W8: A community intervention to decrease distracted driving
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/10852352.2016.1166814
复制
发表时间:
2016-01-01
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
Frisch, Sarah
Frisch, Sarah
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fournier, Angela K.;Berry, Thomas D.;Frisch, Sarah

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究人员测试了一种减少在大学校园开车时使用手机的干预措施。三周内,校园道路上总共记录了 3,827 次驾驶观察。校园干预包括恐惧诉求、承诺和行为提示,采用 ABA 逆转设计(基线-干预-基线)进行测试,并以观察手机使用情况作为依赖指标。卡方独立性测试表明,司机使用手机通话的比例显着下降,从基线时 945 名司机中的 8.5% 降至干预后 1,428 名司机中的 5.5%。相比之下,观察到发短信的司机比例显着增加,从基线时 945 名司机中的 4% 增加到干预后 1,428 名司机中的 6.2%。此外,安全带的使用与观察到的手机使用类型相关。女性与男性的研究结果显着不同。在行为社区干预和交通安全行为的性别差异的背景下讨论了结果。
Researchers tested an intervention to decrease cell-phone use while driving on a university campus. A total of 3,827 driving observations were recorded on a campus roadway over a three-week period. The campus intervention, consisting of fear appeals, pledges, and behavioral prompts, was tested using an ABA reversal design (Baseline-Intervention-Baseline) with observed cell-phone use as the dependent measure. A Chi-Square test of independence indicated the percentage of drivers talking on a cell phone decreased significantly from 8.5% of 945 drivers at Baseline to 5.5% of 1,428 drivers following the Intervention. In contrast, the percentage of drivers observed texting increased significantly from 4% of 945 drivers at Baseline to 6.2% of 1,428 drivers following the Intervention. Additionally, safety-belt use was associated with the type of phone use observed. Findings were significantly different for women versus men. Results are discussed in the context of behavioral community intervention and gender differences in traffic-safety behavior.