Securing Japan: The Current Discourse

Securing Japan: The Current Discourse
复制标题

确保日本安全:当前的讨论

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Richard J. Samuels
Richard J. Samuels
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Richard J. Samuels

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在日本,一场关于大战略的辩论正在进行,它的术语是熟悉的。与19世纪和20世纪的前辈一样,日本的安全规划者在经济和军事手段、硬实力和软实力、同盟伙伴以及支持或反对构建多边安全机制之间做出选择。21世纪初上台的修正主义者可能会用自己的修正主义取代吉田主义。许多人对美国的联盟持批评态度,并渴望获得更大的主权,但很少有人主张彻底决裂。所有人都同意,一个不民主的中国不利于日本的利益。“中等强国”之路--经过修正后可以更充分地抵御中国的力量和美国的衰落--正在酝酿之中。
A debate over grand strategy is underway in Japan, and its terms are familiar. Like their nineteenth- and twentieth-century predecessors, Japanese security planners choose between economic and military instruments, between hard and soft power, among alliance partners, and for or against construction of multilateral security regimes. The revisionists who came to power in the early 2000s may supplant the Yoshida Doctrine with one of their own. Many are critical of the U.S. alliance and eager to achieve greater sovereignty, but few advocate a complete break. All agree that a nondemocratic China is inimical to Japanese interests. The "middle power" road—amended to allow a fuller hedge against Chinese power and American decline—is in the ofï¬ng.