Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis - Lessons from 126 patients attending a chest clinic in north India

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis - Lessons from 126 patients attending a chest clinic in north India
复制标题

DOI:
10.1378/chest.130.2.442
复制
发表时间:
2006-08-01
期刊:
影响因子:
9.6
通讯作者:
Jindal, Surinder K.
Jindal, Surinder K.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Agarwal, Ritesh;Gupta, Dheeraj;Jindal, Surinder K.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的和目标:描述经验。筛选哮喘患者过敏性支气管肺曲菌病(ABPA)到胸部诊所。临床,血清学,放射学和治疗方面,包括ABPA的结果也进行了描述。方法:所有在胸部诊所连续就诊2年以上的哮喘患者均采用曲霉皮肤试验进行筛查。发现阳性的患者进一步调查ABPA。根据高分辨率CT表现,将患者随机分为ABPA-血清阳性(ABPA- s)、ABPA合并中枢性支气管扩张(ABPA- cb)和ABPA- cb合并其他影像学表现(ABPA- cb - orf)。结果:564例患者通过曲霉皮肤试验筛选;223例(39.5%)阳性,126例(27.2%)确诊为ABPA。ABPA-S 34例(27%),ABPA-CB 42例,ABPA-CB- orf 50例。59例患者(46.8%)曾接受过抗结核治疗。绝大多数患者就诊时均为支气管扩张。高衰减黏液嵌塞21例(16.7%)。ABPA的分期、病程、哮喘严重程度和血清学结果(即绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数、IgE水平[总]和IgE水平[烟曲霉])之间无显著差异。中位随访时间为13个月(范围9至38个月)。所有患者在6周时均进入“缓解期”。25名患者在治疗过程中“复发”。109名患者“完全缓解”,17名患者被归类为“糖皮质激素依赖性ABPA”,7名患者被归类为“终末期ABPA”。结论:本院哮喘患者ABPA发生率较高。这种疾病在印度仍未得到充分认识;绝大多数患者在发病时都有支气管扩张,几乎一半的患者最初被误诊为肺结核。有必要重新定义ABPA的定义和糖皮质激素治疗的最佳剂量/持续时间。本研究强调了对哮喘患者进行曲霉菌皮肤试验常规筛查的必要性。
Aims and objectives: To describe the experience. of screening patients with asthma for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) presenting to a chest clinic. The clinical, serologic, radiologic, and treatment aspects including outcome of ABPA are also described.Methods: All consecutive patients with asthma presenting to the chest clinic over a period of 2 years were screened with an Aspergillus skin test. Patients who were found to be positive were further investigated for ABPA. Patients were also arbitrarily classified as ABPA-seropositive (ABPA-S), ABPA with central bronchiectasis (ABPA-CB), and ABPA-CB with other radiologic findings (ABPA-CB-ORF) based on the high-resolution CT findings.Results: Five hundred sixty-four patients were screened using an Aspergillus skin test; 223 patients (39.5%) were found to be positive, and ABPA was diagnosed in 126 patients (27.2%). There were 34 patients (27%) with ABPA-S, 42 patients with ABPA-CB, and 50 patients with ABPA-CB-ORF. Fifty-nine patients (46.8%) had received antitubercular therapy in the past. The vast majority of patients had bronchiectasis at presentation to our hospital. High-attenuation mucous impaction was noted in 21 patients (16.7%). There was no significant difference between the stages of ABPA and the duration of illness, the severity of asthma, and the serologic findings (ie, absolute eosinophil count, IgE levels [total] and IgE levels [for Aspergillus fumigatus]). The median duration of follow-up was 13 months (range, 9 to 38 months). All patients went into "remission" at 6 weeks. Twenty-five patients had a "relapse" during the course of their treatment. One hundred nine patients had "complete remission," 17 patients were classified as having "glucocorticoid-dependent ABPA," and 7 patients were classified as having "end-stage ABPA."Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of ABPA in asthmatic patients presenting at our hospital. The disease entity is still underrecognized in India; the vast majority of patients have bronchiectasis at presentation, and almost half are initially misdiagnosed as having pulmonary tuberculosis. There is a need to redefine the definitions of ABPA and the optimal dose/duration of glucocorticoid therapy. This study reinforces the need for the routine screening of asthmatic patients with an Aspergillus skin test.