ARE RACIAL STEREOTYPES REALLY FADING - THE PRINCETON TRILOGY REVISITED
ARE RACIAL STEREOTYPES REALLY FADING - THE PRINCETON TRILOGY REVISITED
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/01461672952111002
复制
发表时间：
1995-11-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
ELLIOT, AJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DEVINE, PG;ELLIOT, AJ
在这篇文章中，作者指出了经典的普林斯顿三部曲研究的三个方法论缺陷：（a）给受访者的指示含糊不清，（B）没有评估受访者的偏见程度，（c）使用过时的形容词列表。这些缺点在作者对威斯康星州大学学生样本的刻板印象和个人信仰的评估中得到了解决。与普遍支持的褪色刻板印象命题相反，数据表明，存在着一致的和负面的当代黑人刻板印象。将普林斯顿三部曲研究的数据与本研究的数据进行比较，作者得出结论，普林斯顿三部曲研究实际上测量的是受访者的个人信念，而不是（通常假设的）他们对黑人刻板印象的了解。与迪瓦恩的模型一致，高偏见和低偏见的个人在他们对黑人刻板印象的了解上没有差异，但在他们对刻板印象的认可上却大相径庭。
In this article, the authors identify three methodological shortcomings of the classic Princeton trilogy studies: (a) ambiguity of the instructions given to respondents, (b) no assessment of respondents' level of prejudice, and (c) use of an outdated list of adjectives. These shortcomings are addressed in the authors' assessment of the stereotype and personal beliefs of a sample of University of Wisconsin students. In contrast to the commonly espoused fading stereotype proposition, data suggest that there exists a consistent and negative contemporary stereotype of Blacks. Comparing the data from the Princeton trilogy studies with those of the present study, the authors conclude that the Princeton trilogy studies actually measured respondents' personal beliefs, not (as typically assumed) their Knowledge of the Black stereotype. Consistent with Devine's model, high- and low-prejudiced individuals did not differ in their knowledge of the stereotype of Blacks but diverged sharply in their endorsement of the stereotype.