Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”
Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”
复制标题
对“全球树木恢复潜力”的评论
DOI:
10.1126/science.aay7976
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
56.9
通讯作者:
N. Zaloumis
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Veldman;Julie C. Aleman;Swanni T. Alvarado;T. Michael Anderson;Sally Archibald;William J. Bond;T. Boutton;Nina Buchmann;É. Buisson;J. Canadell;Michele de Sá Dechoum;Milton H. Diaz;G. Durigan;J. Ewel;G. W. Fernandes;A. Fidelis;Forrest Fleischman;S. Good;Daniel M. Griffith;J. Hermann;William A. Hoffmann;Soizig Le Stradic;C. E. Lehmann;Grégory Mahy;Ashish N. Nerlekar;J. Nippert;Reed F. Noss;Colin Osborne;Gerhard E. Overbeck;Catherine L. Parr;J. Pausas;R. Toby Pennington;M. Perring;F. Putz;J. Ratnam;M. Sankaran;Isabel B. Schmidt;C. Schmitt;Fernando A. O. Silveira;A. C. Staver;N. Stevens;Christopher J. Still;Caroline A E Strömberg;V. Temperton;J. Varner;N. Zaloumis
Bastin et al.’s estimate (Reports, 5 July 2019, p. 76) that tree planting for climate change mitigation could sequester 205 gigatonnes of carbon is approximately five times too large. Their analysis inflated soil organic carbon gains, failed to safeguard against warming from trees at high latitudes and elevations, and considered afforestation of savannas, grasslands, and shrublands to be restoration.