Patterns of consent:: evidence from a general household survey
Patterns of consent:: evidence from a general household survey
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-985x.2006.00417.x
复制
发表时间：
2006-01-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Sala, Emanuela
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jenkins, Stephen P.;Cappellari, Lorenzo;Sala, Emanuela
我们在一个大型一般家庭调查的背景下分析了同意和同意偏差的模式，这是一项“改善收入和就业的调查”调查，也解决了当存在多个同意问题时出现的问题。四个二元结果的多变量Probit回归模型使用了两个附带截断。我们发现，同意将数据与工作和养老金部门持有的福利和税收抵免管理记录以及雇主持有的工资和就业数据联系起来存在偏见。受访者提供国民保险号的意愿和能力也存在偏差。根据所考虑的问题，偏见是不同的。我们还表明，独立地而不是联合地对同意问题进行建模可能会导致关于同意偏见的误导性推断。影响同意就业部和养老金记录联系的不可观察的个人因素与同意雇主记录联系之间的正相关关系暗示了潜在的个人同意倾向。
We analyse patterns of consent and consent bias in the context of a large general household survey, the 'Improving survey measurement of income and employment' survey, also addressing issues that arise when there are multiple consent questions. A multivariate probit regression model for four binary outcomes with two incidental truncations is used. We show that there are biases in consent to data linkage with benefit and tax credit administrative records that are held by the Department for Work and Pensions, and with wage and employment data held by employers. There are also biases in respondents' willingness and ability to supply their national insurance number. The biases differ according to the question that is considered. We also show that modelling questions on consent independently rather than jointly may lead to misleading inferences about consent bias. A positive correlation between unobservable individual factors affecting consent to Department for Work and Pensions record linkage and consent to employer record linkage is suggestive of a latent individual consent propensity.