Japanese Model of Industrial Relations: Warnings or Opportunities?
Japanese Model of Industrial Relations: Warnings or Opportunities?
复制标题
日本劳资关系模式：警告还是机遇？
DOI：
10.15057/8409
复制
发表时间：
1989
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Mouer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Mouer
自20世纪70年代以来，日本社会组织的各个方面受到关注，成为其他国家效仿的“榜样”人们普遍称赞日本有能力安然度过连续的石油危机（1970年代中期），对傅高尔的《日本第一》（1979年）的关注，以及东南亚和东亚对“向东看”概念的宣传，都指向了日本的成就。虽然澳大利亚人进入这门学问的时间较晚，但从20世纪80年代开始，澳大利亚人也开始对日本生活的各个方面表现出越来越大的兴趣，这可能是日本经济快速增长的原因。在澳大利亚，对日本的兴趣日益浓厚，反映出人们对澳大利亚日益恶化的国民经济表现（从其糟糕的国际收支记录来看）的高度担忧。在背景中，有一种倾向说“亚洲经济领先”（TA, 23.11.83: 8）。在硬币的另一面，在提到澳大利亚成为“香蕉共和国”（TA, 29）时，表达了恐惧、厌恶和哀叹的混合。9.87: 14)，“亚洲贫穷白人”的家园（CM, 26.9.84: 31）和“阿斯拉的阿根廷”2 Voumard (1988), Carney（1988）和其他人认为，对澳大利亚国际经济竞争力丧失的关注主要集中在澳大利亚的劳资关系体系上。在20世纪70年代末，一场有日本大力参与的协调一致的媒体运动强调了澳大利亚已经变得太容易发生罢工的观点（Chalmers 1979）。20世纪80年代初，《汉考克报告》得出结论，澳大利亚的劳资关系已成为“垂死的恐龙”。澳大利亚联邦和各州政府以“罢工休战”的承诺来讨好日本人（CM, 18.9.84: 8）。昆士兰州走得更远。它通过了旨在“工会无政府状态”的反罢工立法（TA, 2-3.3.85: 4），并利用该立法打破电力工人工会的支柱
Since the 1970s various aspects of social organization in Japan have received attention as "models" for other countries to emulate.1 General acclaim for Japan's ability to ride out successive oil shocks (in the mid-1970s), the attention paid to Vogel's Japan as Number One (1979), and the publicity given the notion of "Look East" in Southeast and East Asia all pointed to Japan's achievements. Although latecomers to this school of learning, Australians too began from the beginning of the 1980s to show increasing interest in various aspects of Japanese life which might have accounted for that nation's rapid economic growth. In Australia, the growing interest in Japan has reflected a heightened concern with the deteriorating performance of Australia's national economy as judged by its poor balanceof-payments record. In the background there has been a tendency to speak of "Asia's economic lead" (TA, 23.11.83: 8). On the other side of the coin, a mixture of fear, disgust and lament is expressed in references to Australia becoming a "banana republic" (TA, 29. 9.87 : 14), the home for "Asia's poor whites" (CM, 26.9.84: 31) and "the Argentma of Asra "2 Voumard (1988), Carney (1988) and others suggest that the concern with the loss of Australia's international economic competitiveness has focused largely on Australia's system of industrial relations. In the late 1970s a concerted media campaign with strong Japanese participation hammered home the point that Australia had become too strike prone (Chalmers 1979). In the early 1980s the Hancock Report concluded that Australia's industrial relations had become a "dying dinosaur." Australian governments at federal and state levels wooed the Japanese with promises of a "strike truce" (CM, 18.9.84: 8). Queensland went several steps further. It passed anti-strike legislation aimed at "union anarchy" (TA, 2-3.3.85: 4), and used that legislation to break the back of the Electrical Workers Union