Word order does not constrain phonological activation in single word production
Word order does not constrain phonological activation in single word production
复制标题
词序不限制单个单词产生中的语音激活
DOI：
10.1080/20445911.2011.579071
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Jescheniak
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mädebach;Alekseeva;Jescheniak
最近有人声称，即使在单个单词的生成中，给定语言的规范词序也会限制语音激活过程（Janssen、Alario 和 Caramazza，2008）。该假设预测，对于具有规范形容词-名词词序的语言，如果对象的与任务无关的颜色（即形容词）在语音上与对象名称相似（例如，blue-boatas 与 tored-boats 相比），则命名对象（即名词产生）会更容易。相比之下，命名物体的颜色（即形容词产生）应该没有相应的效果。然而，在对以德语为母语的人进行的实验中，我们观察到了完全相反的模式。语音一致性有利于颜色命名，但对物体命名没有影响。结合其他语言的现有数据，我们的结果表明，对象颜色命名受到对象名称的音系的影响，但反之亦然，无论给定语言中的规范词序如何。
It has recently been claimed that the canonical word order of a given language constrains phonological activation processes even in single word production (Janssen, Alario, & Caramazza, 2008). This hypothesis predicts for languages with canonical adjective–noun word order that naming an object (i.e., noun production) is facilitated if the task-irrelevant colour of the object (i.e., adjective) is phonologically similar to the object name (e.g.,blue–boatas compared tored–boat). By contrast, there should be no corresponding effect in naming the colour of the object (i.e., adjective production). In an experiment with native speakers of German, however, we observed exactly the opposite pattern. Phonological congruency facilitated colour naming but had no effect on object naming. Together with extant data from other languages our results suggest that object colour naming is affected by the phonology of the object name but not vice versa, regardless of the canonical word order in the given language.
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
F. Oppermann;J. Jescheniak;H. Schriefers;Frauke Görges
通讯作者：
F. Oppermann;J. Jescheniak;H. Schriefers;Frauke Görges
DOI：
10.1037/a0022330
发表时间：
2011-05
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Mädebach;J. Jescheniak;F. Oppermann;H. Schriefers
通讯作者：
A. Mädebach;J. Jescheniak;F. Oppermann;H. Schriefers