Trachomatous Trichiasis Clamp vs Standard Bilamellar Tarsal Rotation Instrumentation for Trichiasis Surgery Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Trachomatous Trichiasis Clamp vs Standard Bilamellar Tarsal Rotation Instrumentation for Trichiasis Surgery Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
复制标题

DOI:
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.910
复制
发表时间:
2013-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
8.1
通讯作者:
Merbs, Shannath L.
Merbs, Shannath L.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gower, Emily W.;West, Sheila K.;Merbs, Shannath L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:确定一种新的手术夹具是否能减少手术后的不良结果。方法:将沙眼性倒睫患者随机分为两组,分别使用标准的双板颧骨旋转(BLTR)器械和手术夹具进行手术治疗。主要观察指标:术后并发症、化脓性肉芽肿形成和眼睑轮廓异常。结果:共有1917例(3345眼)患者接受手术。接受TT钳手术的参与者和接受标准BLTR手术的参与者至少有1个不良结局的发生率相似(分别为60.9%和63.0%;调整后的优势比[AOR]=0.88;95%CI,0.66-1.18)。TT钳夹臂肉芽肿发生率低于标准BLTR臂(16.8%比22.4%;AOR=0.67;95%CI,0.46~0.97)。TT钳夹组术后TT明显高于标准BLTR组(分别为43.2%和36.6%;AOR=1.36;95%CI为0.96~1.93)。与标准BLTR相比,TT钳可降低轻度眼睑轮廓异常的风险(分别为9.1%和13.3%;AOR=0.64;95%CI,0.42~0.97),并有减少中度异常的趋势(分别为5.3%和7.8%;AOR=0.63;95%CI,0.39~1.01)。尽管我们的结果与其他方案设置相似,但如此高的不良率是不可接受的;还需要进一步的研究来确定改善TT手术结果的方法。临床应用:一种用于TT手术的新夹子似乎提供了对肉芽肿形成和一些眼皮轮廓异常的保护,但它不能减少术后TT。
Objective: To determine whether a new surgical clamp reduces unfavorable postoperative outcomes.Methods: Patients with trachomatous trichiasis (TT) were randomized to surgery with standard bilamellar tarsal rotation (BLTR) instrumentation or the TT clamp and were followed up for 2 years.Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative TT, pyogenic granuloma formation, and eyelid contour abnormalities, combined and individually.Results: A total of 1917 participants who had surgery (3345 eyes) were enrolled. Rates of at least 1 unfavorable outcome were similar for the participants who underwent surgery with the TT clamp and those who underwent surgery with standard BLTR (60.9% vs 63.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66-1.18). Granuloma was less common in the TT clamp arm than in the standard BLTR arm (16.8% vs 22.4%, respectively; AOR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.97). There was a trend toward increased postoperative TT in the TT clamp arm compared with the standard BLTR arm (43.2% vs 36.6%, respectively; AOR = 1.36; 95% CI, 0.96-1.93). The TT clamp decreased the risk of mild eyelid contour abnormalities compared with standard BLTR (9.1% vs 13.3%, respectively; AOR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.97) and showed a trend for a decrease in moderate abnormalities (5.3% vs 7.8%, respectively; AOR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.39-1.01).Conclusions: Overall, rates of unfavorable outcomes were similar between groups. Although our results are similar to other programmatic settings, such high rates of unfavorable outcomes are unacceptable; future research is needed to identify ways to improve TT surgery outcomes.Application to Clinical Practice: A new clamp for TT surgery appears to offer protection against granuloma formation and some eyelid contour abnormalities, but it does not reduce postoperative TT.