New Digs: Networks, Assemblages, and the Dissolution of Binary Categories in Anthropological Archaeology
New Digs: Networks, Assemblages, and the Dissolution of Binary Categories in Anthropological Archaeology
复制标题
新挖掘：人类学考古学中的网络、组合和二元范畴的消解
DOI：
10.1111/aman.13261
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Steve Kosiba
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Steve Kosiba
人类学考古学长期以来一直是一个分类过程。该分支学科的历史可以通过一个正在进行的项目来呈现，该项目旨在创建、批判然后重塑考古学家用来理解和解释社会和生态过程的类别。尽管理论潮流不断变化，许多考古学家仍然坚持使用一种通用语言来划分他们的研究对象，无论是“过去”、“自然”、复杂性、物质文化还是历史知识。 2018年，考古学学术的强劲潮流既挑战又冲破了许多这些认识论支柱的界限。这不仅仅是质疑历史元叙事或动摇假定的社会普遍性的后现代活动。最近的奖学金开发了创新的理论视角和复杂的方法论工具，以阐明各种人类互动、实践和项目，而这些以前因过于集中于时期、政治、适应和意义等有限类别的研究而被遮挡。此外，考古学家现在比以往任何时候都更加批判性地审视他们所延续的殖民制度，并寻求与土著社区建立新的共同点。一种明显的考古学观点似乎正在形成。这种观点从头开始从人、物和其他有机体之间的复杂关系来看待社会生活，而这些关系不能被简化为包罗万象的类别。 [年度回顾、考古学、考古理论、时事、土著考古学、环境人类学]
Anthropological archaeology has long been a process of categorization. The history of the subdiscipline could be rendered in terms of an ongoing project to create, critique, and then refashion the categories by which archaeologists understand and explain social and ecological processes. Despite ever‐changing theoretical tides, many archaeologists have continued to adhere to a lingua franca that demarcates their object of study, whether “the past,” “nature,” complexity, material culture, or historical knowledge. In 2018, strong currents in archaeological scholarship have both challenged and washed out the boundaries of many of these epistemological mainstays. This was more than a postmodern exercise to question metanarratives of history or to destabilize supposed social universals. The recent scholarship develops innovative theoretical perspectives and sophisticated methodological tools to shed light on the varied human interactions, practices, and projects that were previously occluded by research too sharply focused on bounded categories such as periods, polities, adaptations, and meanings. Furthermore, archaeologists are now more than ever critically examining the colonial institutions that they perpetuate and seeking to establish new common ground with Indigenous communities. A decidedly archaeological perspective seems to be taking shape. This is a view that sees social life from the ground up in terms of complicated relationships between people, things, and other organisms that cannot be reduced to catchall categories. [year in review, archaeology, archaeological theory, current issues, Indigenous archaeology, environmental anthropology]
中国人民大学社会学系/中国人民大学国家调查研究中心（中国）
DOI：
--
发表时间：
--
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
通讯作者：
--
影响因子：
3
作者：
STAR, SL;GRIESEMER, JR
通讯作者：
GRIESEMER, JR