Bourdieu’s Cleft Sociology of Science

Bourdieu’s Cleft Sociology of Science
复制标题

布迪厄的科学社会学的裂痕

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Charles Camic
Charles Camic
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Charles Camic

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文考察了皮埃尔·布迪厄关于科学知识生产的大量著作。研究表明,布迪厄提供了不是一个,而是两个-显着不同-的方法来科学知识的生产,一个在他的理论,或纲领性的,对这个问题的著作制定,另一个在他的经验著作中发展。解决问题的相关性布迪厄的科学研究的工作,分析认为,这两种方法是在布迪厄的工作是一次非常明显的,但其特点是从STS学术的立场上的局限性,而后者的方法是不太明显,但更广泛的经验价值。
The paper examines Pierre Bourdieu’s extensive writings on the production of scientific knowledge. The study shows that Bourdieu offered not one but two - significantly different - approaches to scientific knowledge production, one formulated in his theoretical, or programmatic, writings on the subject, the other developed in his empirical writings. Addressing the question as to the relevance of Bourdieu’s work for science studies, the analysis argues that the former of these two approaches is at once very visible in Bourdieu’s work but characterized by limitations from the standpoint of scholarship in STS, whereas the latter approach is less conspicuous but of broader empirical value.