Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm
Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00008-1
复制
发表时间：
2003-07-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Bowers, JS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Damian, MF;Bowers, JS
四个实验研究了拼写对单个单词语音产生的潜在影响。一个显示初始形式重叠的单词的启动效应的形式准备范式被用来调查是否有形式重叠的单词，但不同的拼写（例如，“camel”-“kidney”）也显示引发。实验一表明，这些词没有受益于形式重叠，这表明不一致的拼写破坏了形式准备效果。实验2重复了第一个实验的一组独立的项目和改进的设计，并再次显示了拼写的破坏性影响。为了转移被试的注意力，实验3完全在听觉领域进行，但结果与之前相同。实验4表明，在没有匹配的声音（例如，“cycle”-“cobra”），不产生引发。这些研究结果提出了一种可能性，即识字的说话者在语音生产中强制激活正字法代码。(C)2003 Elsevier Science（美国）。All rights reserved.
Four experiments investigated potential influences of spelling on single word speech production. A form-preparation paradigm that showed priming effects for words with initial form overlap was used to investigate whether words with form overlap, but different spelling (e.g., "camel"-"kidney") also show priming. Experiment 1 demonstrated that such words did not benefit from the form overlap, suggesting that the incongruent spelling disrupted the form-preparation effect. Experiment 2 replicated the first experiment with an independent set of items and an improved design, and once again showed a disruptive effect of spelling. To divert participants' attention from the spelling of the targets, Experiment 3 was conducted entirely in the auditory domain, but yielded the same outcome as before. Experiment 4 showed that matching initial letters alone, in the absence of matching sounds (e.g., "cycle"-"cobra"), did not produce priming. These findings raise the possibility that orthographic codes are mandatorily activated in speech production by literate speakers. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.