Reorientation and isomerization of trans-stilbene in alkane solutions
Reorientation and isomerization of trans-stilbene in alkane solutions
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/j100319a018
复制
发表时间:
1988-04
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. K. Kim;G. Fleming
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. K. Kim;G. Fleming
Introduction The qualitative influence of the friction exerted by nonpolar solvents on the photoisomerization of ZraŦi-stilbene now seems clear. 1" 6 As predicted by barrier crossingtheories, 7 the rate first rises as friction is increased, reaches a maximum, and then turns over and decreases as friction is increased further. The maximum occurs in high-pressure gas phase, 1· 2 andin liquid solutions the rate is a decreasing function of solvent viscosity. Attempts to provide a quantitative description of both rising3, 6 and falling4, 5 parts of the curve have met with difficulties. In this paper we concentrate on the high-friction (solution) portion of the curve. If the stilbene isomerization rate is plotted as a function of viscosity with different viscosities being obtained by change of solvent or temperature, the rate falls off more slowly than is predicted by Kramers’ equation if the solvent friction is equated with macroscopic shearviscosity. 4, 5 There are several possible explanations for this behavior:(1) The intramolecular potential surface could be solvent dependent. 6, 8 (2) The solvent viscosity may not be an adequate measure of the friction felt by the isomerization molecule, either because the presence of the intramolecular barrier places an emphasis on the short-time response of the solvent (frequency-dependent friction*" 12) or simply because Stokes’s law is inadequate on the molecular scale involved in the isomerization process.(3) Other degrees of freedom than the reaction coordinate may complicate the friction dependence. 13" 15Perhaps the possible inadequacy of Stokes’ law is the most obvious explanation, and recently both Leeet al. 16 and Courtney et al. 17 have taken up the suggestion of Velsko et al. 18 and used rotational reorientation times as a measure of microscopic friction. Both groups found that the Stokes-Einstein relation gave a poor de-scription of reorientation times in a series of alkane solvents at room temperature. Improved fits to Kramers’ equation (in the same solvents) were obtained if the inverse reorientation time was used as the friction measure. 16, 17 Thus, much of the failure of Kramers’ equation to describe stilbeneisomerization in a series of alkanes at room temperature can be traced to the failure of the Stokes-Einstein relation.