PERFORMANCE OF 2 FORMS OF A COMPUTER PSYCHIATRIC SCREENING INTERVIEW - VERSION-I OF THE DISSI
PERFORMANCE OF 2 FORMS OF A COMPUTER PSYCHIATRIC SCREENING INTERVIEW - VERSION-I OF THE DISSI
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0022-3956(91)90005-u
复制
发表时间：
1991-01-01
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
SKARE, SS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BUCHOLZ, KK;ROBINS, LN;SKARE, SS
本研究以传统访谈员管理的 DIS (T-DIS) 作为标准，报告了诊断访谈计划 (DIS) 计算机筛选访谈第一版的两种形式的表现。 筛选访谈要么是自我管理（称为 S-DISSI），受试者键入回答，要么是访谈员管理（I-DISSI），访谈员键入受试者的回答。 两种形式的敏感性和特异性都很充足（不包括反社会人格），敏感性范围为 60% 至 100%，特异性范围为 54% 至 95%。 两种形式的筛选访谈与 T-DIS 的一致性相似，范围为 0.10 至 0.87，与其他研究人员报告的结果相比毫不逊色。 I-DISSI 平均比 T-DIS 和 S-DISSI 少 30 分钟。 由于两个版本的性能相当，因此使用任一版本的决定可能基于可用资源和研究人群的特征。
This study reports on the performance of two forms of version I of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) computer screening interview, using the traditional interviewer-administered DIS (T-DIS) as the standard. The screening interview was either self-administered (called the S-DISSI) with the subject keying in responses, or interviewer-administered (I-DISSI), with the interviewer keying in the subject's responses. Sensitivity and specificity for both forms were ample (excluding antisocial personality), ranging from 60% to 100% for sensitivity and 54% to 95% for specificity. Concordances with the T-DIS were similar for both forms of the screening interview, ranging from .10 to .87 and compared favorably to those reported by other investigators. The I-DISSI took on average 30 min less than either the T-DIS and S-DISSI. Since the performances of both versions were equivalent, the decision to use either may be based on available resources and characteristics of the study population.