The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.
The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.972
复制
发表时间：
1999-06
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Rosemary Pacini;S. Epstein
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rosemary Pacini;S. Epstein
在两项研究中，对一种新版本的经验式思维量表（REI）进行了研究，该量表测量了理性和经验式思维方式，并包括自我报告能力和参与度的分量表。在研究1中，两个主要尺度是独立的，他们和他们的分量表表现出判别效度，并有助于预测的各种措施以外的贡献的大五尺度。理性思维风格与自我力量、开放性、尽责性以及对自我和世界的有利基本信念的关系最为密切和直接，与神经质和保守主义的关系最为密切。体验式思维方式与外向性、宜人性、有利关系信念和情感表达度直接相关，与绝对思维、不信任他人和不宽容性负相关。在研究2中，一个理性的思维方式是负相关的，经验的思维方式是无关的机会游戏中的非最佳反应。得出的结论是，新的REI是一个显着的改进，比以前的版本和措施的独特方面的个性。
A new version of the Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI), which measures rational and experiential thinking styles and includes subscales of self-reported ability and engagement, was examined in two studies. In Study 1, the two main scales were independent, and they and their subscales exhibited discriminant validity and contributed to the prediction of a variety of measures beyond the contribution of the Big Five scales. A rational thinking style was most strongly and directly related to Ego Strength, Openness, Conscientiousness, and favorable basic beliefs about the self and the world, and it was most strongly inversely related to Neuroticism and Conservatism. An experiential thinking style was most strongly directly related to Extraversion, Agreeableness, Favorable Relationships Beliefs, and Emotional Expressivity, and it was most strongly inversely related to Categorical Thinking, Distrust of Others, and Intolerance. In Study 2, a rational thinking style was inversely related and an experiential thinking style was unrelated to nonoptimal responses in a game of chance. It was concluded that the new REI is a significant improvement over the previous version and measures unique aspects of personality.