Recognition through reconnaissance? Using drones for counter-mapping in Indonesia

Recognition through reconnaissance? Using drones for counter-mapping in Indonesia
复制标题

通过侦察识别?

DOI:
10.1080/03066150.2016.1264937
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
The Journal of Peasant Studies
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Michael Flitner
Michael Flitner
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Radjawali;Irendra;Oliver Pye;Michael Flitner

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在这个词被创造出来之前,印度尼西亚有着悠久的土地掠夺历史,从殖民占领到盗贼统治。最近一波的群岛圈地运动建立在大规模的、以市场为导向的空间规划之上。本文分享了我们使用无人机(无人机)来制作高质量社区控制地图的经验,以挑战西加里曼丹省的一些官方空间规划流程。无人机测绘最初是作为考察卡普阿斯河政治生态的行动研究的一个组成部分而开发的,很快就发展出了自己的动力,并在支持非政府组织和达雅克社区的法律的和政治主张方面取得了令人印象深刻的成果。我们认为,相对简单和方便的无人机技术有一定的潜力,进一步承认当地和土著人民及其领土要求。然而,这种观点与最近的辩论形成了鲜明对比,这些辩论强调了反映射的局限性,甚至是有害的社会和政治影响。根据我们在“社区无人机”方面的经验,我们在生产、分销和使用的关键维度上比较了“传统”和无人机反映射。这种比较有助于更清楚地界定无人机反测绘可能成为政治上有用工具的场合和条件。
Indonesia has a long history of land grabs before this term was coined, reaching from colonial occupation to cleptocratic rule. The most recent wave of enclosures across the archipelago builds on large-scale, market-oriented spatial planning. This paper shares our experience of using unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) to produce high-quality community controlled maps in order to challenge some of the official spatial planning processes in West Kalimantan. Developed at first as a component of action research looking at the political ecology of the Kapuas River, the drone mapping soon developed its own dynamics and delivered quite impressive results in bolstering legal and political claims of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and Dayak communities. We argue that relatively simple and accessible drone technology has some potential for furthering the recognition of local and indigenous people and their territorial claims. Such a view, however, stands in contrast to recent debates that have highlighted the limits and even detrimental social and political effects of counter-mapping. Drawing on our experience with ‘community drones’, we compare ‘traditional’ and drone counter-mapping in key dimensions of production, distribution and use. This comparison helps to delimit more clearly the occasions and conditions under which drone-based counter-mapping may be a politically useful tool.
DOI: 10.3138/carto.47.2.77
发表时间: 2012
期刊: Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization
影响因子: --
作者:
R. P. Louis;Jay T. Johnson;A. H. Pramono
通讯作者: A. H. Pramono
绘制边界,转移权力:参与式绘制的社会伦理维度
DOI: 10.4324/9781315573953-25
发表时间: 2008
期刊: The Journal of biological chemistry
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Fox;K. Suryanata;Peter D. Hershock;A. H. Pramono
通讯作者: A. H. Pramono
地图的力量
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0593-88
发表时间: 1992
期刊: The Journal of biological chemistry
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Wood
通讯作者: D. Wood
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0714-0
发表时间: 2015-11
期刊: Ambio
影响因子: 6.5
作者:
Sandbrook C
通讯作者: Sandbrook C
无人机伸张正义:卡普阿斯河沿岸的包容性技术和与河流相关的行动研究
DOI: 10.5194/gh-72-17-2017
发表时间: 2017
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Radjawali;Irendra;Oliver Pye
通讯作者: Oliver Pye