Phylogeny of the major lineages of Membracoidea (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha) based on 28S rDNA sequences
Phylogeny of the major lineages of Membracoidea (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha) based on 28S rDNA sequences
复制标题
DOI：
10.1006/mpev.2000.0873
复制
发表时间：
2001-02-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Black, WC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dietrich, CH;Rakitov, RA;Black, WC
对核糖体28S DNA基因一个3.5kb区域跨越不同的D2 - D10结构域的序列分析支持了基于化石、生物地理学和行为学证据的假说，即角蝉（角蝉科和叶角蝉科）起源于叶蝉（叶蝉科）。最大简约法分析表明，角蝉是一个包含目前公认的叶蝉亚科阿加利叶蝉亚科、大眼叶蝉亚科、阿德隆叶蝉亚科和乌洛叶蝉亚科的谱系的姊妹群。基于这一系统发育估计，角蝉的起源大致与生理和行为的转变相吻合，包括失去苞片体的产生以及从活跃的、能跳跃的若虫向固着的、不能跳跃的若虫的转变。迈尔斯洛皮科，传统上被归为叶蝉亚科乌洛叶蝉亚科的一个族，代表了一个与其他现存角蝉总科不同的基部谱系。分析得出了一个大型叶蝉谱系，包括多系的角顶叶蝉亚科（狭义）及其明显的衍生类群科贝利叶蝉亚科、真叶蝉亚科（多系）、月头叶蝉亚科和彭蒂米叶蝉亚科。包含巨叶蝉亚科、新叶蝉亚科、斯卡叶蝉亚科、伊萨叶蝉亚科、腔叶蝉亚科、广头叶蝉亚科 + 异角叶蝉亚科、伊瓦坎蒂族 + 帕加罗尼族、阿弗罗迪叶蝉亚科 + 莱德林叶蝉亚科（部分）、狭叶蝉族 + 塔尔泰西叶蝉亚科以及叶蝉族 + 原锥叶蝉族的分支也在中等至较高的分支支持下被恢复。叶蝉亚科（广义）、莱德林叶蝉亚科、小叶蝉亚科和截头叶蝉亚科在最简约的拓扑结构上始终是多系的，但将这些类群限定为单系并没有显著增加分支图的长度。主要谱系之间的关系得到的分支支持较低，这表明需要更多的数据来提供可靠的系统发育估计。（C）2001学术出版社
Analysis of sequences from a 3.5-kb region of the nuclear ribosomal 28S DNA gene spanning divergent domains D2-D10 supports the hypothesis, based on fossil, biogeographic, and behavioral evidence, that treehoppers (Aetalionidae and Membracidae) are derived from leafhoppers (Cicadellidae). Maximum-parsimony analysis indicated that treehoppers are the sister group of a lineage comprising the currently recognized cicadellid subfamilies Agalliinae, Megophthalminae, Adelungiinae, and Ulopinae. Based on this phylogenetic estimate, the derivation of treehoppers approximately coincided with shifts in physiology and behavior, including loss of brochosome production and a reversal from active, jumping nymphs to sessile, nonjumping nymphs. Myerslopiidae, traditionally placed as a tribe of the cicadellid subfamily Ulopinae, represented a basal lineage distinct from other extant membracoids. The analysis recovered a large leafhopper lineage comprising a polyphyletic Deltocephalinae (sensu stricto) and its apparent derivatives Koebeliinae, Eupelicinae (polyphyletic), Selenocephalinae, and Penthimiinae. Clades comprising Macropsinae, Neocoelidiinae, Scarinae, Iassinae, Coelidiinae, Eurymelinae + Idiocerinae, Evacanthini + Pagaroniini, Aphrodinae + Ledrinae (in part), Stenocotini + Tartessinae, and Cicadellini + Proconiini were also recovered with moderate to high branch support. Cicadellinae (sensu Late), Ledrinae, Typhlocybinae, and Xestocephalinae were consistently polyphyletic on the most-parsimonious topologies, but constraining these groups to be monophyletic did not significantly increase the length of the cladograms. Relationships among the major lineages received low branch support, suggesting that more data are needed to provide a robust phylogenetic estimate. (C) 2001 Academic Press.