Margin control in open radical prostatectomy: What are the real outcomes?

Margin control in open radical prostatectomy: What are the real outcomes?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.09.019
复制
发表时间:
2010-03-01
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Chang, Sam S.
Chang, Sam S.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cookson, Michael S.;Chang, Sam S.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

完全手术切除前列腺仍然是一个技术上具有挑战性的程序,利用任何外科技术。与腹腔镜技术一样,开放性根治性耻骨后直肠癌切除术技术已经得到改进并继续发展,但生物学风险因素也会影响结局。手术切缘阳性,无论数量或位置如何,不仅是疾病复发的独立预测因子,也是接受二次治疗的独立预测因子。需要进一步研究,以审查继续改善结果的方法。随访和可能的辅助治疗需要个性化的最佳时机和治疗方式继续发展。由爱思唯尔公司出版
The complete surgical removal of the prostate gland remains a technically challenging procedure utilizing any surgical technique. As with laparoscopic techniques, open radical retropubic prostatectomy techniques have been modified and continue to evolve but biological risk factors influence outcomes as well. A positive surgical margin, regardless of number or location, is an independent predictor of not only disease recurrence but also for receiving secondary treatment. Further research is needed to examine methods to continue to improve outcomes. Follow-up and possible adjuvant therapy needs to be individualized as the optimal timing and treatment modality continue to evolve. Published by Elsevier Inc.