Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models
Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models
复制标题
DOI：
10.1175/jhm-d-16-0159.1
复制
发表时间：
2017-05
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
M. Sulis;John L. Williams;P. Shrestha;M. Diederich;C. Simmer;S. Kollet;R. Maxwell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Sulis;John L. Williams;P. Shrestha;M. Diederich;C. Simmer;S. Kollet;R. Maxwell
摘要本研究比较了ParFlow.WRF(PF.WRF)和TerrSysMP两个模拟平台与常用的三维综合地表-地下水模型，以检验模拟土壤-植被-大气相互作用的变异性。给出了两个模拟平台在德国西部北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚地区晴空和强对流降水条件下的理想化和后预报模拟。理想化的模拟突出了陆地表面参数(例如地面蒸发和冠层蒸腾)和大气边界层(ABL)方案在模拟的陆地-大气相互作用上的差异所带来的强烈的变异性。理想化模拟的结果还表明，在陆地表面和大气参数化的两种模式中，对地下水位深度波动的敏感性不同。对于后播模拟，两个模拟平台都模拟了净辐射和累积降雨量。
AbstractThis study compares two modeling platforms, ParFlow.WRF (PF.WRF) and the Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TerrSysMP), with a common 3D integrated surface–groundwater model to examine the variability in simulated soil–vegetation–atmosphere interactions. Idealized and hindcast simulations over the North Rhine–Westphalia region in western Germany for clear-sky conditions and strong convective precipitation using both modeling platforms are presented. Idealized simulations highlight the strong variability introduced by the difference in land surface parameterizations (e.g., ground evaporation and canopy transpiration) and atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) schemes on the simulated land–atmosphere interactions. Results of the idealized simulations also suggest a different range of sensitivity in the two models of land surface and atmospheric parameterizations to water-table depth fluctuations. For hindcast simulations, both modeling platforms simulate net radiation and cumulative precipitation clos...