The pros and cons of change in individuals with eating disorders: A broader perspective
The pros and cons of change in individuals with eating disorders: A broader perspective
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/eat.20250
复制
发表时间：
2006-07-01
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Treasure, Janet
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gale, Corinne;Holliday, Joanna;Treasure, Janet
目的：本研究的目的是制定一份调查问卷来衡量饮食失调症状的利弊，并探讨不同饮食失调群体所认可的主题。方法：从饮食失调志愿者名册和门诊诊所招募的参与者完成了饮食失调利弊量表（P-CED）。主成分分析（PCA）进行验证原项目的析因结构和探索新项目的析因结构。计划比较用于比较诊断组间P-CED评分。结果：主成分分析法对原神经性厌食症量表（P-CAN）题项的利弊解为10因子解，新题项的利弊解为4因子解。神经性厌食症（AN）在5个P-CED分量表上的得分显著高于神经性贪食症（BN），但两种AN亚型之间无显著差异。结论：P-CED是一种有用的工具，可以识别饮食失调的积极和消极方面，可以有针对性地治疗或用作研究结果的衡量标准。(c) 2006年Wiley期刊公司出版。
Objective: The goals of the current study were to develop a questionnaire measuring the pros and cons of eating disorder symptoms and to explore the themes endorsed by different eating disorder groups.Method: Participants recruited from an eating disorder volunteer register and an outpatient clinic completed the Pros and Cons of Eating Disorders scale (P-CED). Principal components analyses (PCA) were performed to validate the factorial structure of the original items and to explore the factorial structure of the new items. Planned comparisons were used to compare P-CED scores between diagnostic groups.Results: PCA indicated a 10-factor solution for the original Pros and Cons of Anorexia Nervosa scale (P-CAN) items and a 4-factor solution for the new items. Participants with anorexia nervosa (AN) scored significantly higher than participants with bulimia nervosa (BN) on five of the P-CED subscales but there were no significant differences between the two AN subtypes.Conclusion: The P-CED is a useful tool for identifying the positive and negative aspects of eating disorders that can be targeted in treatment or used as an outcome measure in research. (c) 2006 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.