Differences in productivities between the Great Australian Bight and the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, in summer
Differences in productivities between the Great Australian Bight and the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, in summer
复制标题
夏季大澳大利亚湾和澳大利亚卡奔塔利亚湾之间的生产力差异
DOI：
10.1007/bf00391524
复制
发表时间：
1978
期刊：
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
A. Taniguchi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Motoda;T. Kawamura;A. Taniguchi
记录了浮游植物（叶绿素）和初级生产力，并估计了澳大利亚两个大海湾——南海岸的大澳大利亚湾（1965年12月）和北海岸的卡奔塔利亚湾（1968年12月）的浮游动物生物量。在卡奔塔利亚湾，浮游植物常备作物（平均 27.3 mg 叶绿素-2）和初级生产力（平均 133.1 mg C m-2h-1）以及浮游动物生物量（平均 305.3 mg 湿重 m-3）远高于大澳大利亚湾（12.1 mg 叶绿素-2、18.2 mg C） m-2h-1, 7.1 mg 湿重 m-3，分别）。大澳大利亚湾的生产力值出人意料地低，这归因于该海湾的环境条件，既没有从陆地获得养分的补充，也没有得到深水的上涌。
Phytoplankton standing crop (chlorophylla) and primary productivity were recorded, and zooplankton biomass was estimated in the two large bays of Australia, the Great Australian Bight on the south coast (December, 1965) and the Gulf of Carpentaria on the north coast (December, 1968). In the Gulf of Carpentaria, the phytoplankton standing crop (average, 27.3 mg chlorophyllam-2) and primary productivity (average, 133.1 mg C m-2h-1), as well as zooplankton biomass (average, 305.3 mg wet weight m-3) are much higher than in the Great Australian Bight (12.1 mg chlorophyllam-2, 18.2 mg C m-2h-1, 7.1 mg wet weight m-3, respectively). The unexpectedly low productivity values in the Great Australian Bight are attributable to environmental conditions of this bay, which obtains neither replenishment of nutrients from the land nor receives upwelling of deep water.