“Studious Men are Always Painted in Gowns”: Charles Willson Peale's Benjamin Rush and the Question of Banyans in Eighteenth-Century Anglo-American Portraiture
“Studious Men are Always Painted in Gowns”: Charles Willson Peale's Benjamin Rush and the Question of Banyans in Eighteenth-Century Anglo-American Portraiture
复制标题
“好学的男人总是穿着礼服”:查尔斯·威尔森·皮尔的本杰明·拉什和十八世纪英美肖像画中的榕树问题
DOI:
10.1179/036121102805253425
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
0.4
通讯作者:
Brandon Brame Fortune
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brandon Brame Fortune
As an art historian conducting research for a 1999 exhibition on portraits of eighteenth-century American men of science, I was struck by the number of images that included long, flowing robes, often made of luxurious materials (Figure 1). This was my introduction to the banyan, or morning gown. Why would these Americans and their British contemporaries wish to be portrayed in undress? Many of them were scholars, but banyans were fashionable and not obviously comparable to the older tradition of depicting scholars in their gowns. I found, in checking the literature of costume as well as art history, that I was not alone in questioning this choice of portrait dress. Costume historians, particularly Margaret Swain and Patricia Cunningham, have published important studies of banyans. These essays provide extensive accounts of their history, construction and use.2 Both Swain and Cunningham also speculated on the connotations of such garments in portraits created during the long eighteenth century. In recent years, other art historians have also begun to ask why long, loosely constructed robesusually considered to be less formal, masculine undress-occur frequently in English and American portraits of men who were merchants, artists, writers, musicians and men of science, and what role they may play in the creation of a pictorial identity for the sitter. Why would such an array of talented, usually