PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
复制标题

DOI:
10.7326/m18-0850
复制
发表时间:
2018-10-02
影响因子:
39.2
通讯作者:
Straus, Sharon E.
Straus, Sharon E.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tricco, Andrea C.;Lillie, Erin;Straus, Sharon E.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

范围审查是一种知识综合,遵循系统的方法来绘制关于某个主题的证据,并确定主要概念、理论、来源和知识差距。虽然正在进行更多的范围界定审查,但其方法和报告质量需要改进。本文件介绍了PRISMA-ScR(系统性综述和荟萃分析扩展范围综述的首选报告项目)检查表和解释。该清单是由24名成员组成的专家小组和2名研究负责人根据EQUATOR(提高健康研究的质量和透明度)网络发布的指南制定的。最后的清单包括20个基本报告项目和2个可选项目。作者为每个项目提供了一个合理的理由和一个良好的报告的例子。PRISMA-ScR的目的是帮助读者(包括研究人员、出版商、专员、政策制定者、医疗保健提供者、指南制定者以及患者或消费者)更好地理解相关术语、核心概念和报告范围审查的关键项目。
Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.