Potential legal issues when caring healthcare robot with communication in caring functions are used for older adult care
Potential legal issues when caring healthcare robot with communication in caring functions are used for older adult care
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.09.024
复制
发表时间：
2020-02-01
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
Schoenhofer, Savina O.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yasuhara, Yuko;Tanioka, Tetsuya;Schoenhofer, Savina O.
在日本，老年人的护理问题正成为一个严重的问题，日本人口老龄化迅速，出生率很低。机器人的发展是弥补医护人员短缺的一项措施。本文的目的是考虑护理医疗机器人（CHR）对老年人护理的潜在法律问题。CHR必须能够识别老年人的言语、面部和存在，并根据获得的信息做出判断和传递信息。CHRs通过接近患者、深入了解患者、照顾患者来履行关怀功能。因此，基于护理的先进人工智能的沟通功能对CHRs至关重要。维持和改善老年人日常生活活动能力的能力是通过双向信息中继促进活动。此外，如果不保证安全性和责任归属，在临床实践中引入CHRs将无法进行。由于各国的法律不同，在日本使用chr时，有必要了解日本的政策和相关法律。目前，在信息安全方面还没有中央规定。在日本，法律是在案件发生后制定的；因此，在新问题发生时处理它们将不会有法律指导的好处。需要建立一个广泛的法律框架或在早期阶段采取预防措施。因此，作为第一步，建立使用CHRs的指导方针将是有价值的。(C) 2019年由Elsevier Espana， S.L.U.出版
The issue of older adults' care is becoming a serious concern in Japan, which has a rapidly aging population and a low birthrate. The development of robots is pushed forward as a measure to compensate for the healthcare worker shortage. The purpose of this paper is to consider the potential legal issues of caring healthcare robot (CHR) for older adults' care. A CHR must recognize the speech, face, and presence of older adults, and make judgments and relay information based on acquired information. CHRs fulfill the caring function by being close to patients, to know them deeply, and to look after them. Therefore, communication functions by advanced artificial intelligence based on caring in nursing are essential for CHRs. The ability to maintain and improve the activities of daily living (ADL) of older adults is to facilitate activities through bidirectional information relay. Furthermore, without guarantees on the safety and ascription of responsibilities, the introduction of CHRs in clinical practice will not proceed. As laws differ from country to country, it is necessary to examine Japanese policies and related laws when using CHRs in Japan. Currently, there are no central rules on information security. In Japan, the law is made after a case has occurred; thus, dealing with novel issues as they occur will not have the benefit of legal guidance. Creating a broad legal framework or taking preventive measures at an early stage is needed. Therefore, as a first step, establishing guidelines for the use of CHRs will be valuable. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.