Education Markets, Choice and Social Class: the market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA
Education Markets, Choice and Social Class: the market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA
复制标题
教育市场、选择和社会阶层：英国和美国的市场作为阶层战略
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Ball
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Ball
在大西洋两岸的政策制定圈中，市场替代教育正在获得越来越多的支持。家长选择和学校竞争被视为实现改革和提高标准的途径，同时减少国家对教育规划的干预。本文对支持市场和反对公共垄断教育的论点进行了质疑，认为在这两个方面，倡导者的主张都是片面的和有缺陷的。未能解决市场不平等的基础和影响的问题得到了特别关注。文章认为，教育市场为追求阶级优势提供了可能，并产生了差异化和层次化的学校教育制度。1我感谢我的同事Sharon Gewirtz、Richard Bowe和Alan Cribb，以及Barry Troyna、Manfred Weiss和两位裁判，他们对本文的论点做出了贡献。该报还受益于与Richard Bowe和Sharon Gewirtz正在进行的关于两个再保险的讨论。
The market alternative in education is gaining ground in policy‐making circles on both sides of the Atlantic. Parental choice and school competition are seen as ways of achieving reform and raising standards while at the same time reducing State intervention into education planning. This paper interrogates the arguments made for markets and against public monopoly schooling; and it is argued that on both counts the claims of advocates are partial and flawed. The failure to address the bases and effects of inequalities of the market are given particular attention. It is argued that markets in education provide the possibility for the pursuit of class advantage and generate a differentiated and stratified system of schooling. 1I am indebted to my colleagues Sharon Gewirtz, Richard Bowe and Alan Cribb, and Barry Troyna, Manfred Weiss and two referees for their contributions to the arguments in this paper. The paper also benefited from ongoing discussions with Richard Bowe and Sharon Gewirtz related to two re...