A Cultural-Historical Interpretation of Resilience: the implications for practice
A Cultural-Historical Interpretation of Resilience: the implications for practice
复制标题
复原力的文化历史解释：对实践的影响
DOI：
10.7146/ocps.v9i1.2087
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Apostolov
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Edwards;A. Apostolov
最近在英格兰防止弱势儿童被社会排斥的尝试是由韧性的概念驱动的，这种概念主要集中在改变儿童，使他们能够更好地科普逆境。借鉴文化历史活动理论（CHAT）的概念，我们建议，弹性的想法应该扩大到包括发展的能力，采取行动，重塑一个人的发展的社会条件。我们使用的证据，从两项研究的做法，在最近重新配置的儿童服务在英格兰，以研究从业者是否看到这些方面的弹性。我们提出的例子，体现了这些观点的工作，但建议他们不容易纳入实践中的专业知识是集中在照顾和明确的沟通。护理和沟通模式的做法反映了重点给予进化的概念，儿童发展，而CHAT的弹性的观点反映了维果茨基的关注与个人之间的辩证法和他们的发展的社会情况。
Recent attempts at preventing the social exclusion of vulnerable children in England have been driven by notions of resilience which centre primarily on changing children so that they may be better able to cope with adversity. Drawing on the concepts of Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), we suggest that the idea of resilience should be expanded to include developing a capacity to act on and reshape the social conditions of one’s development. We use evidence from two studies of practices in recent re-configurations of children’s services in England to examine whether practitioners are seeing resilience in these terms. We present examples of work which embody these views but suggest that they are not easily incorporated into practices where expertise is centred on care and clear communication. The care and communication model of practice reflects the emphases given to evolutionary notions of child development while a CHAT view of resilience reflects Vygotsky’s concerns with a dialectic between individuals and the social situations of their development.