Accuracy of home blood glucose monitors using forearm blood samples: FreeStyle versus One Touch Ultra.
Accuracy of home blood glucose monitors using forearm blood samples: FreeStyle versus One Touch Ultra.
复制标题
使用前臂血样的家庭血糖监测仪的准确性：FreeStyle 与 One Touch Ultra。
DOI：
10.1093/ajhp/60.11.1130
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
R. Hamilton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jason Demers;M. P. Kane;G. Bakst;R. Busch;R. Hamilton
研究了两种使用前臂血液样本的家用血糖监测仪的准确性。通过静脉穿刺获得成人血液样本并分析葡萄糖浓度。静脉穿刺后5分钟内，使用与静脉穿刺相同的前臂，使用FreeStyle和One Touch Ultra监测仪进行两次外周血血糖测量。通过比较每个监测器获得的每个第一外围棒的结果与实验室参考值来评估准确性。通过评估第一和第二外周棒之间葡萄糖值的平均差值来评估监测精度。采集了250名受试者的血液样本，其中170人（68%）患有糖尿病。使用FreeStyle和One Touch Ultra获得的血糖读数分别有98.8%和98.4%是临床可接受的，分别有65.2%和59.2%的测量值在实验室参考值的10%以内。第一次和第二次血糖测量的平均差异是FreeStyle 9.7 mg/dL, One Touch Ultra 5.2 mg/dL。95.6%使用FreeStyle的受试者需要一根外周血棒才能获得足够的血液样本，而使用One Touch Ultra的受试者需要83.2%。使用FreeStyle和One Touch Ultra设备获得的前臂血糖测量值与静脉穿刺获得的实验室参考值相似。
The accuracy of two home blood glucose monitors using forearm blood samples was studied. Blood samples were obtained from adults by venipuncture and analyzed for glucose concentration. Within five minutes after venipuncture, peripheral blood glucose measurements were taken in duplicate with the FreeStyle and One Touch Ultra monitors by using the same forearm as used for venipuncture. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the results for each first peripheral stick obtained by each monitor with the laboratory reference value. Monitor precision was evaluated by evaluating the mean difference in glucose values between the first and second peripheral sticks. Blood samples were obtained from 250 subjects, 170 (68%) of whom had diabetes mellitus. A total of 98.8% and 98.4% of the blood glucose readings obtained with FreeStyle and One Touch Ultra, respectively, were clinically acceptable, and 65.2% and 59.2% of the measurements, respectively, were within 10% of the laboratory reference values. The average difference between the first and second glucose measurements was 9.7 mg/dL for FreeStyle and 5.2 mg/dL for One Touch Ultra. One peripheral stick was needed to obtain an adequate blood sample in 95.6% of subjects using FreeStyle, compared with 83.2% of subjects using One Touch Ultra. Forearm blood glucose measurements obtained with the FreeStyle and One Touch Ultra devices were similar to laboratory reference values obtained by venipuncture.