Verhagen, Pieter C., A History of Sanskrit Grammatical Literature in Tibet
Verhagen, Pieter C., A History of Sanskrit Grammatical Literature in Tibet
复制标题
Verhagen, Pieter C.，《西藏梵文语法文学史》
DOI：
10.1163/000000003124995133
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Scharfe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Scharfe
在第一卷中，作者对敦煌藏文正典集《B》中的语法文献进行了考察。在第二次非经典翻译中，将藏文梵语印度语言学的原始著作改进为藏文，支持了广泛的翻译活动（如将文本翻译成藏文），以及对印度文本的被动接受和对传统坎德拉戈明作品中梵语语法的纯粹。他们保持在tou访问印度佛教中心（Näland突出）和后来的佛教在尼泊尔的佛教中心。从t时代开始，寺院团体的一个坎诺不仅翻译了如此庞大的主体，而且修订了原始的佛经注释。一个例子是布斯顿的（七世纪或八世纪？）在Durgasimha对Kätantra I 2，17的评论中，详细描述了Te'tra”these [men] here”的形成，其中两个词的形成和它们之间的连读变调都是参考Kätantra的规则来解释的（第100页）。83-87）。思图潘陈（18世纪）之际盟友提供了严厉的批评翻译的Buston和其他人，他的新评论包含许多改进这些早期的作品（页。107 f.，121 f.，169-178）。虽然他的代表作，对Cändra-vyäkarana的评论，主要是一个评论，它试图广泛和比较概述，包括几个梵语语法系统。司徒花了很大的力气收集所有可用的文献，甚至前往尼泊尔获得手稿和生活在那里的印度梵学家的个人指导。121、174、177）。与印度的联系并没有完全中断，这一点从Si-tu对Rämacandra的Prakriyâ-kaumudtek（14或15世纪）的引用中可以清楚地看出。这部作品或类似的作品是思图奇怪的章节“The
In volume one1 the author had survey grammatical literature found in tran Tibetan canonical text-collections, the B found in Dun Huang. In this second v non-canonical translations, improved ve original Tibetan works on Sanskrit gram Indian linguistics to the Tibetan languag supported the extensive translation acti texts were translated into Tibetan), and passive reception of Indian texts and pur of Sanskrit grammar in the tradition Candragomin's works. They kept in tou visits to Indian Buddhist centers (Näland prominent) and later-when Buddhism to Buddhist centers in Nepal. One canno of the monastic community that from t times not only translated such a large body and revisions improved the original tra commentaries.An example is Bu-ston's (seventh or eighth century?) detailed explana tion of the formation of te'tra" these [men] here" in Durgasimha's commentary on the Kätantra I 2, 17, where the formation of both words and the sandhi between them are explained with references to the rules of the Kätantra (pp. 83-87). Si-tu Pan-chen (eighteenth century) occasion ally offered severe criticisms of translations by Bu-ston and others; his new commentaries contain many improvements over these earlier works (pp. 107f., 121 f., 169-178). Though his magnum opus, a commentary on the Cändra-vyäkarana, is primarily a commentary, it attempts a wide and comparative overview including several Sanskrit grammatical systems. Si-tu went to great lengths to gather all available literature, and even traveled to Nepal to obtain manuscripts and personal instruction from Indian pandits living there (pp. 121, 174, 177). That the connections with India were not totally interrupted is clear from Si-tu's references to Rämacandra's Prakriyâ-kaumudï (fourteenth or fifteenth century). Either this work or one similar to it was the source for Si-tu's curious chapter" The