What can Captive Whales tell us About their Wild Counterparts? Identification, Usage, and Ontogeny of Contact Calls in Belugas ( Delphinapterus leucas )
What can Captive Whales tell us About their Wild Counterparts? Identification, Usage, and Ontogeny of Contact Calls in Belugas ( Delphinapterus leucas )
复制标题
圈养鲸鱼能告诉我们关于野生鲸鱼的哪些信息?
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Barrett‐Lennard
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Valeria Vergara;R. Michaud;L. Barrett‐Lennard
Contact calls are ubiquitous in social birds and ma mmals. Belugas are among the most vocal of cetaceans, but the function of their calls is poorl y understood. In a previous study we hypothesized that a broad band pulsed call type labeled “Type A, ” serves as a contact call between mothers and their calves. Here we examined context-specific use of call types recorded from a captive beluga social group at the Vancouver Aquarium, and found that the Type A call comprised 24% to 97% of the vocalizations during isolation, births, death o f a calf, presence of external stressors, and re-un ion of animals after separation. In contrast it compris ed 4.4% of the vocalizations produced during regular sessions. We grouped 2835 Type A calls into five variants, A1 to A5. A discriminant function analysis classified 87% of calls in the same groupi ngs that we assigned them to by ear and visual examination of spectrograms. The variants do not re present individual signatures. One variant, A1, was used by three related individuals: an adult fem ale, her male calf and his juvenile half-sister. Ou r previous research documented the gradual development of the A1 variant by the male calf, until at 20 months he was producing stereotyped renditions of h is mother and sister’s A1. We used our findings to generate testable predictions about the usage of these signals by wild belugas. We verified the existence of signals with the same distinctive feat ures as the contact calls found in captivity in the repertoire of St. Lawrence Estuary herds, and documented their usage by two wild individuals from different populations. In the St. Lawrence, these w ere emitted by a female calling after a dead-calf. In Hudson Bay, by a temporarily restrained juvenile. We propose that these calls function in nature, as in captivity, to maintain group cohesion, and that the variants shared by related animals are used for mother-calf recognition.