Inflectional frames in language production

Inflectional frames in language production
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/01690960143000182
复制
发表时间:
2002-06-01
期刊:
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Levelt, WJM
Levelt, WJM
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Janssen, DP;Roelofs, A;Levelt, WJM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作者报告了六个内隐启动实验,这些实验考察了屈折形式的产生。参与者对提示做出反应,从小集合中产生单词。这些单词在形式上不同,或共享单词首部段,这为准备工作留出了空间。在恒定的屈折集合中,单词有相同数量的屈折后缀,而在可变集合中,后缀的数量不同。在实验中,得到了常量下的制备效果大于变量下的制备效果。对照实验表明,这种效果的差异不是由于句法类别或语音形式本身造成的。研究结果按照词汇生成的槽填充模型来解释,在该模型中,屈折框架以及词干和词缀是在抽象的词形句法规范的基础上独立拼写出来的,紧随其后的是语素与框架的关联。
The authors report six implicit priming experiments that examined the production of inflected forms. Participants produced words out of small sets in response to prompts. The words differed in form or shared word-initial segments, which allowed for preparation. In constant inflectional sets, the words had the same number of inflectional suffixes, whereas in variable sets the number of suffixes differed. In the experiments, preparation effects were obtained, which were larger in the constant than in the variable sets. Control experiments showed that this difference in effect was not due to syntactic class or phonological form per se. The results are interpreted in terms of a slot-and-filler model of word production, in which inflectional frames, on the one hand, and stems and affixes, on the other hand, are independently spelled out on the basis of an abstract morpho-syntactic specification of the word, which is followed by morpheme-to-frame association.