Pilot Study Using Telemedicine Video Consultation for Vascular Patients' Care During the COVID-19 Period.
Pilot Study Using Telemedicine Video Consultation for Vascular Patients' Care During the COVID-19 Period.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.023
复制
发表时间：
2020-10
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Cheng SW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Li HL;Chan YC;Huang JX;Cheng SW
本试点研究旨在评估2019冠状病毒病（COVID-19）期间中国使用远程医疗虚拟通信为血管患者提供远程医疗保健的有效性和患者满意度。患者和血管外科医生之间使用微信软件（腾讯，中国深圳）进行视频通话，当时人们在中国旅行受到限制和限制。在每次视频通话结束时，使用简短的问卷调查来评估患者的满意度。于2020年2月19日至3月16日的COVID-19期间，165名（69%）患者的114名样本在一次电话尝试后获得。两位血管外科医生和114名患者之间进行了142次远程医疗远程通信。该队列患者的平均年龄为60 ± 15.2（范围25 - 90）岁，74例（65%）为男性。25名患者（22%）在接到视频电话时在我省以外。视频通话的平均持续时间为11.0 ± 8.9分钟。所有患者都认为远程医疗是一种很好的替代来医院就诊的方式，95%（108/114）的患者更愿意远程医疗而不是推迟预约。所有患者都同意远程医疗的优点，包括无感染风险，无需旅行，无需长时间等待。所有患者都对视频通话表示“满意”或“高度满意”，他们希望在未来使用远程医疗进行随访。在COVID-19期间，远程医疗虚拟通信有效地提供了远程医疗保健，患者满意度很高。远程医疗为脆弱的血管病患者提供支持，而无需旅行和面对面的医院咨询，从而避免了传播和感染。
The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness and patients satisfaction of using telemedicine virtual communications to provide remote health care to vascular patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) period in China. Video calls using WeChat software (Tencent, Shenzhen, China) between patients and vascular surgeons were conducted in a period when there were restrictions and limitations for people’ travels in China. At the end of each video call, a short questionnaire was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction level. During the COVID-19 period from 19 February to March 16, 2020, a sample of 114 from 165 (69%) patients was reached after one phone call attempt. One hundred forty-two telemedicine remote communications were made between the two vascular surgeons and 114 patients. The mean age of this cohort of patients were 60 ± 15.2 (range 25 to 90) years old, and 74 (65%) were men. Twenty-five patients (22%) were outside of our province when they received the video call. The mean duration of the video call was 11.0 ± 8.9 minutes. All of the patients thought telemedicine was a good substitute for coming to hospital, and 95% (108/114) of them preferred to have remote telemedicine rather than postpone the appointment. All the patients agreed with the advantages of telemedicine including no infection risks, no need to travel, and no need to wait for long time. All the patients were “satisfied” or “highly satisfied” with the video call and they would like to use telemedicine for follow-up in the future. Telemedicine virtual communications was effective to provide remote health care with a high patient satisfaction during the COVID-19 period. Telemedicine offers support to vulnerable vascular patients without the need for travel and face-to-face hospital consultation, and so avoided transmission and infection.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.003
发表时间：
2019-05-01
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Shah, Nisha;Martin, Guy;Darzi, Ara
通讯作者：
Darzi, Ara
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Chittle, Melissa D.;Rao, Sandhya K.;Wasfy, Jason H.
通讯作者：
Wasfy, Jason H.
DOI：
10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.279
发表时间：
1998-12-01
期刊：
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ricci, MA;Knight, SJ;Callas, PW
通讯作者：
Callas, PW
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Wang, Zhelong;Gu, Hong
通讯作者：
Gu, Hong
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Shen, Lin;Li, Qi;Xu, Ruihua
通讯作者：
Xu, Ruihua