It’s a sprint, not a marathon: a case for building short-term partnerships for community-based participatory research

It’s a sprint, not a marathon: a case for building short-term partnerships for community-based participatory research
复制标题

这是一场短跑,而不是马拉松:为基于社区的参与性研究建立短期合作伙伴关系的案例

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
E. Lewis
E. Lewis
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lucero Radonic;Cara Jacob;Rowenn Kalman;E. Lewis

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

学术日历和大学时间表为研究人员设定了紧迫的步伐,这可能会阻碍建立长期的社区伙伴关系。鉴于基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)强调社区主导的研究,时间限制可能会抑制学术研究人员对协作方法和参与式研究的承诺。本文探讨了CBPR如何适用于短期参与,同时仍然产生互利的研究。在这样做的时候,我们有助于现有的语料库快速评估方法,其特点是采用传统的方法,在较长的时间内较短的时间框架。我们回顾了在密歇根州弗林特市六个月的时间跨度内执行的CBPR项目的成功和局限性。在所讨论的情况下,照片语音使人们能够在CBPR框架内纳入各种不同的认知方式、横向伙伴关系、互惠学习和可访问的disemination格式。总之,我们认为短期CBPR是有价值的,特别是对于需要快速响应方法的紧急问题。然而,短期CBPR是一场冲刺,而不是马拉松;虽然持续时间较短,但强度更大。它要求在方法上作出重大承诺、灵活性和增加参与者的工作量。
Academic calendars and university timelines set an urgent pace for researchers, which can hinder the establishment of long-term community partnerships. Given community-based participatory research’s (CBPR) emphasis on community-led research, time constraints can inhibit academic researchers’ commitments to collaborative methodologies and participatory research. This article considers how CBPR can be adapted for shorter-term engagements while still producing mutually beneficial research. In doing so, we contribute to the existing corpus on rapid assessment methodologies, characterized for adopting methods traditionally practiced over a longer duration to shorter time frames. We review the successes and limitations of a CBPR project executed within the timespan of six months in Flint, Michigan. In the case discussed, photo-voice enabled the inclusion of diverse ways of knowing, horizontal partnerships, reciprocal learning, and an accessible disemmination format within a CBPR framework. In conclusion we assert that there is value in short-term CBPR, especially for emergent issues where there is a need for rapid, responsive methodologies. However, short-term CBPR is a sprint, rather than a marathon; although shorter in duration, it is more intensive. It requires significant methodological commitments, flexibility, and an intensified workload for those involved.