Traditional and innovative echocardiographic parameters for the analysis of right ventricular performance in comparisonwith cardiac magnetic resonance
Traditional and innovative echocardiographic parameters for the analysis of right ventricular performance in comparisonwith cardiac magnetic resonance
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/ehjci/jeu156
复制
发表时间:
2015-01-01
影响因子:
6.2
通讯作者:
Mondillo, Sergio
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Focardi, Marta;Cameli, Matteo;Mondillo, Sergio
Aims Right ventricle fractional area change (RVFAC), tissue Doppler and M-mode measurements of tricuspid systolic motion [tricuspid Sm and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)], and 3D echocardiography are the current noninvasive methods for the quantification of RV systolic function; RV deformation analysis by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) has recently allowed the analysis of RV performance. Using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as the reference standard, this study aimed at exploring the correlation between the traditional (fractional shortening, s'RV, TAPSE) and innovative (strain) echocardiographic parameters and RV ejection fraction (RVEF) measured by CMR.Methods and results CMR and transthoracic echo-Doppler were performed in 63 patients referred for clinical assessment. Twenty-one presented the suspicion of myocarditis, 8 presented idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 10 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 10 arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD), 5 infiltrative cardiomyopathy, and 9 other reasons. RVEF was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RVFAC, tricuspid S', and TAPSE were calculated in all patients. RV longitudinal strain (RVLS) by STEwas assessed by averagingRVfree-wall segments (free-wallRVLS) and by averaging all segments (globalRVLS). TheROCanalysiswas applied for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Goodcorrelationswere found for TAPSE, tricuspid S', and global RVLS with RVEF (r = 0.45, r = 0.52, and r = 20.71, respectively; P = 0.01 for all). Close correlations between free-wall RVLS and RVFAC with RVEF were found (r = 20.86 and r = 0.77, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both). Furthermore, free-wall RVLS demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy [area under curve (AUC) 0.92] and good sensitivity and specificity of 96 and 93%, respectively, to predict reduced RVEF