Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results

Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.028
复制
发表时间:
2004-07-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Hogan, N
Hogan, N
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fasoli, SE;Krebs, HI;Hogan, N

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:研究机器人康复对脑卒中后慢性运动障碍患者的影响,并检查运动能力的改善在治疗结束后4个月是否持续。设计:前测后测设计。环境:康复医院,门诊。参与者:42名在过去1至5年内因单侧中风而持续性偏瘫的志愿者样本。干预:上肢麻痹的机器人治疗包括感觉运动主动辅助训练,或在重复性平面到达任务中进行渐进式阻力训练,每周3次,持续6周。主要观察指标:改良Ashworth量表、Fugl-Meyer评定量表(FMA)、运动状态量表(MSS)评分和医学研究委员会运动功率评分。结果:两组治疗前临床评价差异无统计学意义。从入院到出院,从入院到随访,统计学上有显著的获益(P
Objectives: To study the effects of robotic rehabilitation in persons with chronic motor impairments after stroke and to examine whether improvements in motor abilities were sustained 4 months after the end of therapy.Design: Pretest-posttest design.Setting: Rehabilitation hospital, outpatient care.Participants: Volunteer sample of 42 persons with persistent hemiparesis from a single, unilateral stroke within the past 1 to 5 years.Intervention: Robotic therapy for the paretic upper limb consisted of either sensorimotor active-assistive exercise, or progressive-resistive training during repetitive, planar reaching tasks, 3 times a week for 6 weeks.Main Outcome Measures: Modified Ashworth Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Motor Status Scale (MSS) score, and Medical Research Council motor power score.Results: No significant differences were found among pretreatment clinical evaluations. Statistically significant gains from admission to discharge and from admission to follow-up (P