Mass Transport Deposits:Implications for Reservoir Seals
Mass Transport Deposits:Implications for Reservoir Seals
复制标题
质量运输沉积物：对储层密封的影响
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Omeru
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Omeru
本文采用二维（2D）和三维（3D）相结合的地震反射方法
This thesis uses a combination of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) seismicreflection
data to investigate the morphology and internal architecture of mass transport
deposits (MTDs) from the west Nile delta, offshore Egypt and from the Deepwater Taranaki
Basin, New Zealand. The overall aim of the project is to gain an improved understanding of
the impact of MTDs on hydrocarbon seals. To this end a novel seismic based classification
for MTDs that is directly mappable onto the problem of defining their potential as sealing
sequences is proposed based on results of investigations from three core research chapters.
In the first core chapter, the phases and mechanisms of failure of three main MTDs (termed
A, B and C) in the western Nile delta (Eastern Mediterranean) was investigated using 3D
seismic data. Analysis of the geometries of the MTDs suggests that they were emplaced in at
least two main phases: Progressive failure occurred initially with MTD A cutting through
MTDs B and C. Retrogressive failure then occurred due to the natural unbalance of the
supposed headwall of MTD A. Reconstruction of the pre-seabed topography suggests a
minimum total volume (residual and depleted) of remobilisation of the order of 750 km3,
making this amongst the largest submarine landslide complexes documented to date. It is
suggested that this giant slope failure might have posed a risk to the integrity of petroleum
seals considering that the failure occurred in a gas rich province of the western Nile delta.
In the second core chapter, six large scale MTDs, stacked and locally amalgamated making
up c. 50% of the stratigraphic succession were recognised and mapped using 2D seismic data.
Key kinematic features suggest a north-westerly transport direction for all of the MTDs with
the exception of MTD 6, having a south-westerly transport direction. There is seismic
stratigraphic evidence in the form of both lateral and basal truncations suggesting that the
MTDs were erosive during their emplacement. Estimation shows that c 70% of the final
volume of MTD 6 was contributed from substrate cannibalization greater than the other five
MTDs in the study area. This work suggests that the rheology of the substrate immediately
beneath the seafloor might not be the only factor controlling the degree of substrate
cannibalisation during MTD emplacement and that the nature of any triggering mechanism
might also play an important role. This has a bearing on the MTD content (sandy or muddy
dominated MTD) and would in turn influence the seal integrity of MTD.
The final core chapter presents insights into the dynamics of emplacement of MTD 6 using
3D seismic data. MTD 6 consists of five distinctive domains (labelled A – E). Domains A –
C show evidence of deformation and remobilisation of c. 30% of a lower transparent interval
while Domain D is characterised by a partial or complete loss of seismic character coupled
with c. 30% reduction in thickness compared to adjacent domains. Based on the deformation
styles, the transition across domain boundaries and the observed volume loss, a progressive
stratal disaggregation is inextricably linked with gravity spreading as the mode of
emplacement of MTD 6. This study highlights the power of 3D seismic data in unravelling
the detailed processes involved during MTD emplacement and which may have significant
implications as regards the translation and emplacement of other submarine slope failures in
other continental margins.