Key figure of mobility: the exile Key Figure of Mobility: The Exile
Key figure of mobility: the exile Key Figure of Mobility: The Exile
复制标题
流动性的关键人物：流亡者 流动性的关键人物：流放者
DOI：
10.1111/1469-8676.12380
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Hackl A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hackl A
流亡是一个古老的政治流离失所概念，表达了受其影响的人的持久后果。至少自古以来，流亡一直是一种特殊的存在，但对于那些书写它的人来说，流亡也是一种象征形式。这种滑移导致作为流离失所条件的流亡经历与人物所象征的品质之间的差距不断扩大，从而使谁在什么情况下可以被视为流亡的问题变得复杂化。本文有效地利用了条件和人物之间的这种滑动，首先通过爱德华·萨义德追溯了这个人物，并概述了流亡者与其他流动和侨民关键人物的关系。第二个分析步骤将这一数字与人类学研究以及流亡“在家”的巴勒斯坦人的特殊情况进行比较。一旦被恢复为流动人类学的流离失所条件，流亡就阐明了政治流离失所的主观和时间维度及其持久的后果。它帮助我们掌握人们被排除、允许和被迫迁移的无数过程，同时也说明了人们之间和周围的边界和政治项目的被迫移动。
Exile is an ancient concept of political displacement expressing the enduring consequences for those affected by it. At least since antiquity exile has been a particular existence but also a form of figuration for those writing about it. This slippage contributed to a widening gap between experiences of exile as a condition of displacement and the qualities the figure symbolises, thus complicating the question of who may be considered exiled under what circumstances. Using this slippage between condition and figure productively, this article first traces the figure through Edward Said and outlines the exile's relation to other key figures of mobility and diaspora. A second analytical move compares this figure to anthropological research and to the particular case of Palestinians living in exile ‘at home’. Once reinstated as a condition of displacement for the anthropology of mobility, exile illuminates the subjective and temporal dimensions of political displacement and its enduring aftermath. It helps us to grasp the myriad processes by which people are excluded, allowed and forced to move, while also illustrating the forced movement of boundaries and political projects across and around people.