Language in Time: Lexical and structural ambiguity resolution
Language in Time: Lexical and structural ambiguity resolution
复制标题
及时的语言：词汇和结构歧义的解决
DOI：
10.1075/aicr.12.06hil
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dieter Hillert
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dieter Hillert
在认知科学的背景下对人类语言处理的研究需要考虑心理表征和过程的语言学和心理学的跨学科研究。特别是语言学方法侧重于语音，语义和句法结构，是中央的句子加工在生产和感知。相反，话语模式区分了语言、概念和情景三个层面的表征（例如，Johnson-Laird 1983;货车Dijk & Kintsch 1983; Kintsch 1988）。概念层面处理文本结构，反映全球和本地方面的意义。文本内容在整体解释语境中的整合发生在情境层面。从方法论的角度来看，如果话语不被理解为外部的人工制品（e-discourse），而是内部编码的信息结构（i-discourse）的反映，那么话语模型为语言过程的研究提供了一个有希望的途径（如Chomsky 1965，1986）。不同的层次，根据特定的规则和表现形式相互区分，可以与结构模块相比较。从心理学的角度研究这些语言和概念结构的心理加工特性。这种分析不仅限于语言系统的内部过程，而且特别限于语言系统与其他认知模块或系统的互动过程。心理语言学数据提供了关于心理编码组织结构的认知现实的证据，这种跨学科的方法为认知和神经过程的建模和模拟提供了基础。
An investigation of human language processing in the context of a program of cognitive science requires interdisciplinary research in linguistics and psychol ogy taking account of mental representation and process. In particular a lin guistic approach focuses on phonological, semantic and syntactic structures that are central to sentence processing in both production and perception. By con trast, a model of discourse distinguishes between the linguistic, conceptual and situative levels of representation (eg, Johnson-Laird 1983; van Dijk & Kintsch 1983; Kintsch 1988). The conceptual level treats text structures reflecting global and local aspects of meaning. The integration of textual content in a global interpretive context occurs at the situative level. On a point of method ology we should note that a discourse model provides a promising approach to the investigation of language processes if discourse is not understood as an ex ternal artifact (e-discourse), but as a reflection of internally encoded informa tion structures (i-discourse)(eg, Chomsky 1965, 1986). Various levels, which are distinguished from each other on the basis of specific rules and representa tions, are comparable to structural modules. From a psychological point of view these linguistic and conceptual structures are studied with regard to their properties of mental processing. The analysis limits itself not only to internal processes of the linguistic system but, in particular, to the interactive processes of the language system with other cognitive modules or systems. Psycholinguistic data supply evidence about the cognitive reality of mentally-encoded structures of organization, and this interdisciplinary methodology provides a foundation for modeling and simulating of cognitive and neurological proc-