Fluvial carbon export from a lowland Amazonian rainforest in relation to atmospheric fluxes

Fluvial carbon export from a lowland Amazonian rainforest in relation to atmospheric fluxes
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/2016jg003464
复制
发表时间:
2016-12
期刊:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Vihermaa;S. Waldron;T. Domingues;J. Grace;E. Cosio;Fabián Limonchi;C. Hopkinson;H. Rocha;E. Gloor
L. Vihermaa;S. Waldron;T. Domingues;J. Grace;E. Cosio;Fabián Limonchi;C. Hopkinson;H. Rocha;E. Gloor
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Vihermaa;S. Waldron;T. Domingues;J. Grace;E. Cosio;Fabián Limonchi;C. Hopkinson;H. Rocha;E. Gloor

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们将排水分析与涡动相关(eddy covariance, EC)测量的陆地二氧化碳通量相结合,构建了西亚马逊流域一个集水区的整体碳收支。由于河流碳输出可以代表永久碳输出,因此必须将其纳入整个站点的碳平衡评估中,但很少进行。通量塔的足迹面积由两条小溪流(~ 5-7 km2)排出,我们测量了溶解无机碳(DIC)、溶解有机碳(DOC)、颗粒有机碳(POC)输出和CO2流出。EC测量显示,该地点的碳平衡为+0.7±9.7 Mg C ha−1 yr−1(大气源),河流输出为0.3±0.04 Mg C ha−1 yr−1。在全部河流损失中,DIC占34%,DOC占37%,POC占29%。雨季是河流C输出最重要的季节。EC结果和之前的生物质小区研究存在很大的不确定性(- 0.5±4.1 Mg C / ha - 1 yr - 1);因此,不能确定该场址是碳汇还是碳源。河流出口仅对应于与站点C平衡相关的不确定性的3-7%;因此,需要考虑其他因素,以减少不确定性和改进估计的C平衡。然而,河流C输出是显著的,特别是在几乎中性的地点,河流损失可能决定地点C平衡的方向。C下游的命运决定了河流输出对气候的总体影响。
We constructed a whole carbon budget for a catchment in the Western Amazon Basin, combining drainage water analyses with eddy covariance (EC) measured terrestrial CO2 fluxes. As fluvial C export can represent permanent C export it must be included in assessments of whole site C balance, but it is rarely done. The footprint area of the flux tower is drained by two small streams (~5–7 km2) from which we measured the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC) export, and CO2 efflux. The EC measurements showed the site C balance to be +0.7 ± 9.7 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 (a source to the atmosphere) and fluvial export was 0.3 ± 0.04 Mg C ha−1 yr−1. Of the total fluvial loss 34% was DIC, 37% DOC, and 29% POC. The wet season was most important for fluvial C export. There was a large uncertainty associated with the EC results and with previous biomass plot studies (−0.5 ± 4.1 Mg C ha−1 yr−1); hence, it cannot be concluded with certainty whether the site is C sink or source. The fluvial export corresponds to only 3–7% of the uncertainty related to the site C balance; thus, other factors need to be considered to reduce the uncertainty and refine the estimated C balance. However, stream C export is significant, especially for almost neutral sites where fluvial loss may determine the direction of the site C balance. The fate of C downstream then dictates the overall climate impact of fluvial export.